Answer: The James-Lange theory
Explanation: The James-Lange theory argues that emotional reactions felt in human stirs from physical interpretation attached to the physiological (relates to the way or manner in which the bodily parts of an individual functions) response which emanates due to an external or environmental stimulus.
In essence, James-Lange theory proposed by William James and Carl Lange opines that physical interpretation of physiological responses determines emotional reaction.
In the scenario above, Harry wants to use physiological response and physical interpretation attached to facial smile will translate into an emotional state of being happier.
Answer:
Overcrowding
<span>Sewage systems
Tenement houses</span>
Explanation:
Since many people crammed into small areas in order to be close to the factories in which they worked you had overcrowding and tenement houses. Also in the early stages they tend to have problems with sewage systems which caused a lot of sickness and bad smelling streets.
Answer:
The answer is serial position effect.
Explanation:
Serial position effect is a term that describes the tendency of an individual to remember the first and last items in a list with greater accuracy than items in the middle of the list.
The term which was coined by German psychologist Herman Ebbinghaus posits that the position which an item takes in a list affects how accurately it can be remembered by an individual when he/she has to recall items in the list.
Likely rule against Mark.
Mark and Charles had an oral agreement over a few years and nothing was put into writing. This would trigger the statute of frauds, wherein certain types of agreements are required to be memorialized in writing.
This means that there is a situation in which two people are having to be taken at their word. On top of that, the agreement was made while they were impaired.
If a court didn't rule against Mark at the outset, there would be an investigation into whether the agreement was enforceable, how impaired they were, whether anyone else heard them, and what the historic uses were but there isn't enough time for a prescriptive easement or adverse possession. But this is likely a summary judgment case based on statute of frauds.
Answer: D. Maria would not have to pay anything
Explanation:
Maria would not have to pay anything because this does not fall under the terms of a QUASI CONTRACT as she did not gain unjustified enrichment.
In a QUASI contract, the main bone of contention is the ACCEPTANCE of a service but not the AGREEMENT of terms which can lead to unjust enrichment. In other words, if you ACCEPT a service but did not request it, you still have to pay.
Maria in this case neither requested NOR ACCEPTED the service and so she does not have to pay.
