Equations are steeper when their slope's positive value is higher (ignore negatives when determining how steep a slope is). The slope is the value in front of x. If there isn't a value in front of x, then it is assumed to be 1.
The one on the right is correct. please give brainliest.
If Suzanne can read 1 page in 3 minutes, that means that in ONE hour, she can read 20 pages.
1 page per 3 minute
60minutes : 3 = 20 pages
Now, multiply 20 pages by 5 hours.
20 x 5 = 100.
I hope it helps! (She's pretty slow at reading)
We are choosing 2
2
r
shoes. How many ways are there to avoid a pair? The pairs represented in our sample can be chosen in (2)
(
n
2
r
)
ways. From each chosen pair, we can choose the left shoe or the right shoe. There are 22
2
2
r
ways to do this. So of the (22)
(
2
n
2
r
)
equally likely ways to choose 2
2
r
shoes, (2)22
(
n
2
r
)
2
2
r
are "favourable."
Another way: A perhaps more natural way to attack the problem is to imagine choosing the shoes one at a time. The probability that the second shoe chosen does not match the first is 2−22−1
2
n
−
2
2
n
−
1
. Given that this has happened, the probability the next shoe does not match either of the first two is 2−42−2
2
n
−
4
2
n
−
2
. Given that there is no match so far, the probability the next shoe does not match any of the first three is 2−62−3
2
n
−
6
2
n
−
3
. Continue. We get a product, which looks a little nicer if we start it with the term 22
2
n
2
n
. So an answer is
22⋅2−22−1⋅2−42−2⋅2−62−3⋯2−4+22−2+1.
2
n
2
n
⋅
2
n
−
2
2
n
−
1
⋅
2
n
−
4
2
n
−
2
⋅
2
n
−
6
2
n
−
3
⋯
2
n
−
4
r
+
2
2
n
−
2
r
+
1
.
This can be expressed more compactly in various ways.
<h2><u>
Answer with explanation:</u></h2>
Let p be the proportion of voters in a certain state support an increase in the minimum wage.
As per given , we have
Since alternative hypothesis is right-tailed so the test is a right-tailed test.
Test statistic : 
, where n= sample size.
p= population proportion.
= sample proportion.
. In a random sample of 300 fast food workers for 240 supporters increase an minimum-wage.
i.e. n= 300 and 
Then,
For significant level α = .05 , the critical z-value is
Decision : Since calculated z-value (3.78) is greater than the critical value (1.645) , so we reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion : We have sufficient evidence o support researcher's claim that that the percentage of fast food workers for support and increase is higher than 70%..
