Durkheim argues that crime is Inevitable
Explanation:
- In The Rules of Sociological Method Durkheim introduces us into the realm of deviance. He believes that crime is a normal and inevitable phenomenon, as crimes occur in all societies so far, and are most prevalent in developed countries.
- Durkheim believes that not all people are equally committed to common moral norms and social values. Each of us is exposed to different social influences and it is not possible to achieve complete social equality.
- Durkheim imagines a society of saints, made up of perfect individuals, in which there would be no crime or robbery, in which care would be taken to avoid social transgression, and proves that such a society is impossible because in such a society the most trivial rule violations would become grave crimes.
Learn more on Durkheim on
brainly.com/question/5747901
brainly.com/question/7657612
brainly.com/question/8469269
#learnwithBrainly
what about the firebombing at tokyo?
The map illustrates the size of the Louisiana Purchase and suggests its economic potential. The map clarifies that the Louisiana Territory was large enough to be sold for more money
Locke believed that human nature is characterized by reason and tolerance. Locke believed that certain rights are inalienable and should not be denied to anybody. These are the right to life, liberty and property.
I agree that no written law should contradict these rights. This is because of the fundamental nature of the rights. Any law that denies these rights will result in tyranny and denial of basic rights.
The concept of rule of law basically refers to a situation whereby a country is bound to a system of laws. This is a key tenet of democracy whereby no individual is above the law ensuring that there is law and order.
The idea of rule of law is important as it guarantees everybody an equal opportunity to pursue their happiness. It checks abuse of power by those in position of power and allows people to exercise their liberty
Women and girls were not thought of back then for having the same rights as men. Men were seen as powerful and superior rather than women who were seen as nonsuperior. They didn’t want women to have the same amount of power that men had.
