The answer is c....the whole purpose was to keep them as segregated as possible
The Texan Rangers were the regulators in the texan border. Regulators were Texas rangers who patrolled the streets terrorising Mexicans and hunting down American-Indian livestock rustlers. When Texas required independence from Mexico in order to operate alone as a republic, the regulators and rangers came to power.
Charles W. Jackson and Charles W. Moorman were the main Regulators commanders, and their main objective was to stop cattle rustling. But when the Regulators' acts grew out of control, a rival vigilante organisation known as the Moderators was established to "moderate" the Regulators.
To learn more Texas refer
brainly.com/question/20737446
#SPJ4
<u>Answer:
</u>
In the context of Supreme Court conferences, the statement that is true of a dissenting opinion is that it is expressed by a judge or justice who disagrees with the majority opinion.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- When a case is heard by a bench of multiple justices sitting in odd numbers, there is a possibility that there is a difference of opinion among the judges regarding the decision to be given in the case.
- In such instances, the decision which is given by the majority of judges is deemed to be final, but the judges who do not agree with the decision given have the right to express their dissent in writing.
Answer:
I would say A, because there is less healthcare and doctors available. Also, the climate and land/terrain may vary depending where you live. If you live somewhere in a cold forest, then it is likely you could trip on something or get frostbite.
The black plague killed one 3rd of all europeans.
