Answer:
c.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this was done because they stated that the mandatory nature violated the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. The Sixth Amendment rights guarantees criminal defendants their rights of having a public trial, a lawyer, and impartial jury, and the right to face your accuser.
Research has indicated one issue that results in negative consequences. Such issue that results to that is:
Let's understand what chronic understaffing is all about.
<h3>Chronic Understaffing</h3>
- Chronic Understaffing is known to be a situation where a work unit is operating with insufficient manpower.
- This happens over a long period of time.
- It leads to negative consequences that affect the available employees.
Learn more about staffing on brainly.com/question/25112935
Answer:
cohesion, large heat capacity, low density as a solid, and good solvent
Explanation:
Water is a good solvent and is important in dissolving some compounds and changing them into
liquid state.
Water has a large heat capacity which means it can absorb large amount of heat before drying up and this is important in the homeostatic process of plants and animals.
It has a low density as a solid which simply means its solid form isn’t denser and heavy compared to other solids.
It has good cohesive Forces which encourages surface tension. This surface tension prevents the breaking of substances under stress.
Answer:b.had never been aggressive became the most aggressive after watching the violent film
Explanation:Children are most likely to be influenced to do exactly what they see being done either by their parents or by watching it on TV.
For example children who watch wrestling even though they can be told that this shouldn't be tried at home but still most of them try it on each other .
So it is very likely that even when they watch the violent film they will try to do what they saw , they may not have guns but they will try to imitate exactly what was being portrayed on the film.
Answer:
D. Judicial Activism
Explanation:
Judicial Activism is the judicial philosophy that argues the Court should go beyond the words of the Constitution or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.
It is the opposite of Judicial Restraint, as a judicial philosophy theory, which limits the power of judges to act only as per existing legal provisions under constitution.
