1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
UkoKoshka [18]
3 years ago
6

In third-party negotiations, a third party who provides an informal communication link between the negotiator and the opponent i

s known as a( n) ________.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Drupady [299]3 years ago
5 0
<span>In third-party negotiations, a third party who provides an informal communication link between the negotiator and the opponent is known as a conciliator. 

A conciliator is defined as a person who acts as a mediator between two people or groups in an argument that needs to be agreed on.
</span>
You might be interested in
Age, occupation, and lifestyle have little impact on consumer behavior. <br> a. True <br> b. False
True [87]
Hello! This answer is false. Factors like age, occupation, and lifestyle play an important role on someone's buying behavior. It could affect how much they buy, what they buy, and how much they could buy. Everyone is different. It all depends on the person.
4 0
3 years ago
Consumer sovereignty assumes that which fundamental statement in a market economy is true?
butalik [34]

The correct answer is C.

In a market economy, economic outcomes are determined by the free interactions of economic agents (households, corporations and public sector) in the markets, where they act either as producers or consumers, defining with their choices (production or<u> purchase choices, respectively), the prices and the quantities exchanged of every good and service. </u>

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court: Group of answer choices overturned the lower court conviction of a Socialist. ru
Nikitich [7]

Answer:

In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>

Explanation:

In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.

This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.

Thus, the correct answer is the second option.

6 0
3 years ago
Summarize and discuess the importance of elizabeth loftus' work on misinformation effect.
vfiekz [6]

The correct answer is “When a person's recollection of episodic memories becomes less accurate as a result of post-event knowledge, this is referred to as the misinformation effect.”.

Since the mid-1970s, researchers have been investigating the misinformation impact. Elizabeth Loftus is one of the field's most significant researchers.

<h3>What is the Misinformation Effect?</h3>

Misinformation effect accommodates various views. According to one view, the original knowledge and the deceptive information supplied after the fact became mixed together. Another theory is that the false information replaces the true information. Lastly, experts argue that because the erroneous information is the most current, it is more quickly accessed.

<h3>Why is it critical to comprehend the misinformation effect?</h3>

Understanding the misinformation effect is especially significant because of the implications for the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Misinformation can be absorbed into witnesses' recollections through exchanges with other witnesses, police questioning, and court appearances.

To know more about Eyewitness testimony, visit: brainly.com/question/26651069

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
The protection of children’s education rights from excessive work time was guaranteed by the
sashaice [31]

The protection of children’s education rights from excessive work time was guaranteed by the The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

The FLSA is the Federal law which sets minimum wage, overtime, recordkeeping, and youth employment standards. This law protects workers against certain unfair pay practices or work regulations.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • South Korea exports many of the parts that are on the cars we drive each day. Luckily, there are safety regulations in place to
    10·1 answer
  • What book would you carry if you traveled like Alexander the Great did?
    15·1 answer
  • Upon receiving feedback on a research paper she wrote, kara’s professor noted that in some areas of her paper, kara failed to ma
    12·1 answer
  • Are you helping to save the environment? a usa today snapshot found that about 78% of americans believe that recycling trash mak
    10·1 answer
  • The _____ state occurs at the beginning of sleep when you may experience visual, auditory, and kinesthetic sensations
    5·1 answer
  • Joey was rollerblading without a helmet and landed on his head. In the last two weeks since the accident, he has not been doing
    5·1 answer
  • Someone help pleaseeeeee
    15·1 answer
  • What does the word capitalized most likely mean?
    9·1 answer
  • Needd helpp! How did Civil rights, Political rights and Sovereignty help lead the Hawaiian kingdom to becoming a Constitutional
    11·2 answers
  • Which principle would be considered when caring for a client with a closed wound drainage system?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!