1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Taya2010 [7]
3 years ago
14

Explain how the tabacco companies could challenge the rules. Discuss whether the rules will be set aside. It is helpful to defin

e
Law
1 answer:
xeze [42]3 years ago
7 0
7. ¿Cómo se puede describir su vida actual / ahora? |ı
8. ¿Cómo se describe el espanglés? ¿Qué piensa de este dialecto?
9. ¿Cómo ha cambiado su español? ¿Cómo reacciona a estos cambios?
You might be interested in
2. Which of the following is NOT true of trying juveniles as adults?
Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
3 years ago
What factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation?
devlian [24]

The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that

  • The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
  • The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
  • The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
  • The actions of defendant’s  led to a breach of the contract
  • The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
  • The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.

For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means

  • There are two types of tortious interference
  1. Tortious interference with contract
  2. Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
  • Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project

From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:

  • The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
  • The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
  • The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
  • The actions of defendant’s  led to a breach of the contract
  • The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
  • The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct

Learn more Tort interference from:

brainly.com/question/15058912

8 0
2 years ago
when firms from wealthy countries trade with firms from poor countries, they benefit from economic____.
Ulleksa [173]

Economic arbitrage occurs when businesses from wealthy nations trade with businesses from poor nations.

- In order to profit from a price differential, an investor will use the investment method of arbitrage to simultaneously buy and sell an asset in other marketplaces. The returns can be impressive when multiplied by a high volume, despite the fact that pricing variations are often tiny and transient.

- As an illustration, the stock of a phone firm trades on the NYSE for $25. It trades for $25.50 in the Shanghai Stock Exchange at the same time. The arbitrageur purchases the stock from the NYSE and sells it right away on the Shanghai market for a 50 cent profit.

To know more about arbitrage, kindly click on the link below :

brainly.com/question/14676030?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

7 0
1 year ago
What branch has 2/3 majority override?.
Gemiola [76]

Congress has 2/3 majority override.

A congress is a proper assembly of the representatives of different countries, constituent states, businesses, change unions, political parties, or other companies. The time period originated in past due center English to indicate an come upon (meeting of adversaries) at some point of struggle, from the Latin congress.

Today, Congress includes one hundred senators ( from each country) and 435 balloting individuals of the residence of Representatives. The phrases of workplace and quantity of contributors directly impacts every group. With four times the membership, the residence follows approaches closely and bounds debate.

This branch includes Congress (the Senate and residence of Representatives) and special groups and offices that offer help offerings to Congress.

Learn more about congress here : brainly.com/question/491441

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Name the government agency whose information is valuable in tracing assets, establishing conflicts of interest, identifying dumm
    12·2 answers
  • What type of speech does the First Amendment not protect?a. Only defamationb. Only obscenityc. Only commercial speechd. Defamati
    13·1 answer
  • A feature of decisional law in common law systems which says that, a court, in making a decision, should follow the rulings of p
    8·1 answer
  • Is death penalty moral or immoral?
    6·2 answers
  • Policy implementation refers to the bureaucratic function of
    13·1 answer
  • During the straight-in parking aspect of the driving skills test, what should
    13·1 answer
  • Do you believe lethal injection is more human than the electric chair, and why?
    10·2 answers
  • 4___4______5<br>123456789091918Q8Q
    12·1 answer
  • Xác định các bộ phận giả định, quy định, chế tài trong các điều luật sau:
    14·1 answer
  • why does the Republican party rely on him so heavily? Why does the news cover him so closely? He technically can’t offer anythin
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!