if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
<h3>
</h3><h3>
What is wrong with the graph?</h3>
When we graph over intervals like (a, b) or [a, b] or something like that, we use dots to define the end of the intervals, and to denote that the function ends abruptly or we have a jump.
In this case, you can see that between the end and the second part and the beginning of the third part there is a jump, so the use of dots is correct there, but if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
That is the only error with the graph.
If you want to learn more about piecewise functions:
brainly.com/question/3628123
#SPJ1
Answer:
<h2>6 unit cubes</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Look at the picture.</em>
For this case we have that the relationship is direct.
Therefore, we have:
Where,
y: distance traveled in kilometers
x: number of liters of fuel
k: proportionality constant
We must look for the value of k. For this, we use the following data:
This car can travel 476 kilometers on 17 liters of fuel.
Substituting values we have:
From here, we clear the value of k:
Therefore, the relationship is:
For 1428 kilometers we have:
Clearing the amount of fuel we have:
Answer:
51 liters of fuel are required for the vehicle to travel 1,428 kilometers
Answer:
The correct answer is 0 or choice A on edge
Step-by-step explanation:
right on edge
Answer:
If 4 fish are randomly selected, what is the probability that the mean weight will be between 9.6 and 15.6 lb? Round your answer to four decimal places.
