Answer:
A. an electric company
Explanation:
Among all the options given above, it is an electric company that cannot be rivaled due to the fact that, all household definitely need electricity in-order to power their home. Due to the nature of the company and how capital intensive it is, it would always be in demand by the people.
Answer:
prices to fall according to the classical economists and unemployment to increase according to Keynes.
Explanation:
The classical economists believes that a decrease in aggregate demand for goods produced would being about fall in the prices of such goods. What this implies is that as more goods are produced, if such production is not backed by corresponding demand by consumers, the prices of such goods produced will eventually fall because supply is greater than demand.
For the Keynes, their argument is that a decrease in aggregate demand will cause unemployment to increase. This is because owners of businesses or employers would lay off their employees when goods produced exceeds the demand for such production by consumers. Here, owners of businesses pays their employees through sales of goods produced. So, when the goods produced are not purchased, then there will be excess availability of such goods; hence no sale or profit, from which salaries would be paid. The next step is to start laying off employees because employers cannot cover their running costs.
Answer:
4 million houses
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the forfeited benefit as a result of choosing one option over others. Its value equals the cost of the next best alternative.
The cost of constructing a new home is $150,000. If the Federal Defence has a budget of $600 billion, the opportunity cost of spending that amount will be the equivalent number of units that can be built by the amount.
To calculate the number of units= $600 billion divided by $150,000
= $600,000,000,000/ $150,000
=4,000,000
=4 million units
Answer: $730.2
Explanation:
Let the total cost of cleaning clothes = X
Other variables include:
Total cost of boxes = $6×120
=$720
Ordering cost =$3
Holding costs = (10/100 ×6)12
=$7.2
Total costs of cleaning clothes =
The cost of boxes+ordering cost+holding cost
=720+3+7.2 = $730.2
Answer: The correct answer is "b. production and distribution processes becoming obsolete.".
Explanation: The typical risks of a cost leadership strategy include production and distribution processes becoming obsolete because to maintain cost leadership, the production and distribution processes must always be in constant observation to modify if necessary in order to maintain competitiveness and not remain stuck attached to a production and distribution model that as a consequence of innovations in the competition may become obsolete.
