Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
First, note that

And using the chain rule in one variable

Now remember that the chain rule in several variables sates that

Therefore the chain rule in several variables would look like this.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
<h3><u>Given functions:</u></h3>
- f(x) = 4x² - 6
- g(x) = x² - 4x - 8
<h3><u>Solution:</u></h3>
Subtract both functions
(f-g)(x) = 4x² - 6 - (x² - 4x - 8)
(f-g)(x) = 4x² - 6 - x² + 4x - 8
Combine like terms
(f-g)(x) = 4x² - x² + 4x - 6 - 8
(f-g)(x) = 3x² + 4x - 14
![\rule[225]{225}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Crule%5B225%5D%7B225%7D%7B2%7D)
7tens8ones
6tens18ones
5tens28ones
4tens38ones
3tens48ones
2tens58ones
1tens68ones
0tens78<span>ones</span>
Answer:
750 mm, 7.5 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
Verify each case
case a) 2.5 km, 2,500 m
we know that
1 km ------> 1.000 m
so
2.5 km=2,500 m
therefore
The pair of measurements is equivalent
case b) 750 mm, 7.5 cm
we know that
1 cm ------> 10 mm m
so
7.5 cm=75 mm
therefore
<u>The pair of measurements is not equivalent</u>
case c) 3 m, 3,000 mm
we know that
1 m ------> 1.000 mm
so
3 m=3,000 mm
therefore
The pair of measurements is equivalent
case d) 120 cm, 1.2 m
we know that
1 m ------> 100 cm
so
1.2 m=120 cm
therefore
The pair of measurements is equivalent
Answer:
21,22,23
Step-by-step explanation: i love fried chicken look at my skin color