Churchill had a claim that could have prevented Germany from taking the Sudetenland, and this claim was:
- They could have joined forces with France so that they could be safer.
<h3>What is a claim?</h3>
A claim is an assertion that something is a case and typically with no evidence or proof to back it up.
In Churchill's claim, he offered NO evidence for it.
Read more about <em>Germany</em> here:
brainly.com/question/24909197
Answer: (this is gonna be a crazy answer)
Explanation: I think it was right to drop the bomb on Japan. The reason for this is because even though many people died, and the fact that most of their land had gotten destroyed, this helped them resolve their problem between the two. If it weren't for the bomb, they would have fought longer. And after that tragedy, this gave Americans and the Japanese to bond and help rebuild japan not only to protect them from other bombs, but to also make sure that no one else can take their land. Therefore, even though it may not have been the best decision, it was right to to drop the bomb on them.
(You don't have to agree with this this is just my opinion but hopefully you get an idea to form your own sentence if you can)
It should be the south but if it’s wrong sorry
At the time English colonists arrived in the spring of 1607, coastal Virginia was inhabited by the Powhatan Indians, an Algonquian-speaking people. The Powhatans were comprised of 30-some tribal groups, with a total population of about 14,000, under the control of Wahunsonacock, sometimes called “Powhatan.”
