Answer:
Called the clients and cancelled jobs
Explanation:
If the plaintiff worked for the defendant and left to set up her own cleaning business, then she will most likely be bound by a non-compete clause.
So if she is saying she acted with the value of integrity, then she would called any of the defendant's clients and cancelled jobs in order to respect the non-compete clause.
However after sometime the non-compete clause is no longer binding.
Answer:
Comparative advantage.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the ability to produce good and services at a lower opportunity cost compared to others , leading to lower selling price and competitive advantage over others .
Specialization is about concentrating on producing a few products in order to
build brands , expertise and gain maximum productivity leading to a reduction in selling price and a comparative advantage.
Answer:
The answer is: Alais will prevail because of material breach of the contract
Explanation:
Material breach in contract law refers to one party failing to perform under the contract significantly enough so that the aggrieved party has the right to sue for breach of contract.
In this case when Rutherford failed to perform, Alais sustained enough "damage" that enables her to sue Rutherford. She probably was no longer able to finish her job in time.
Answer:
Budgeted overhead= $283,400
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Production:
October= 192,000
variable overhead is applied at a rate of $0.70 per unit of production.
Fixed overhead equals $149,000 per month.
To calculate the budgeted overhead, we need to determine the total variable overhead for the month:
Budgeted overhead= fixed overhead + total variable overhead
Budgeted overhead= 149,000 + 0.7*192,000
Budgeted overhead= $283,400
Go to the stock market holders, or look it up online
Hope this helps!