Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option C.
James Madison used the idea of a three-branch system described in Montesquieu’s The Spirit of the Laws to create the Constitution.
Explanation: Charles Montesquieu was born in the France during the reign of Luis XIV who was an absolute king. Montesquieu was born in a noble family and he studied law. He traveled all over Europe and studied parliament . He wrote a book in 1722 which made sarcasm of king Luis XIV.
His greatest work The Spirit of Laws was published in 1748. There he discussed about the laws and government. He believed that the main purpose of the government is to maintain the law and order. He said in is book that the the best form of government was one in which the legislative, executive, and judicial powers were separate and kept each other in check to prevent any branch from becoming too powerful. He believed that uniting these powers, as in the monarchy of Louis XIV, would lead to despotism.
USA followed his principal while forming the constitution. James Madison who was one of the founder fathers of USA used the idea of a three-branch system described in Montesquieu’s The Spirit of the Laws to create the Constitution.
Answer:
JFK was not a strong supporter of civil rights for African Americans because when he became president in 1961, African Americans throughout much of the South were denied the right to vote, barred from public facilities, subjected to insults and violence, and could not expect justice from the courts. In the North, black Americans also faced discrimination in housing, employment, education, and many other areas. But the civil rights movement had made important progress, and change was on the way.
tobacco farming is correct answer.
Answer:
Colonialism in North Africa, because of its violence and the huge transformations it caused within its societies, shaped a historical vision of the North African past that obscured other, far more deeply rooted processes. This paper not only aims to emphasize the impact of these other, deeper historical processes, it also suggests that by taking in to account this longue durée, our analytical frameworks would be expanded and so too would our understanding of Maghreb history in general and its colonial history in particular. The first section of the paper analyzes the outlines of colonial history; it examines the limitations of the spatial framework and the timeline markers used within this field of research. The second section examines the new vistas of research opened through serious consideration of the legacy and persistent effects of early modern history in North Africa. It explores these new perspectives in terms of time and space and interpretations of North African primary sources.
Explanation:
