The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Indeed, global warming has been in the foreground of politics and science for quite some time. There have been numerous studies conducted on the effects of global warming and what we might do to mitigate any threats. I think some policymakers are wary of the findings and some can trust that the conclusions are sound for the following reason.
Politicians are wary because, in reality, there are no 100% conclusive arguments that confirm that global warming is the result of humans. For other politicians, the evidence provided by environmental institutions is valid and they are prompt to proclaim that humans are to blame for global warming.
What is real, is that earth scientists think that global warming caused significant climate change in the past. And when they say the past, they mean a time before humans appeared on planet earth.
Climate change or global warming is not new for planet earth. It is a phenomenon that has happened in the past according to scientists and national agencies. It is believed that global warming had caused natural disasters such as the melting of ice caps and the flooding of many lands on Earth, destroying life forms.
That is why right now, many agencies are closely researching climate change. Among those institutions are the US National Academy of Sciences, the Geological Society of America, the American Meteorological Society, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Some important framers were George Washington, Janes Madison, and Benjamin Franklin. These people are called framers because they were the ones who wrote and organized the constitution of the United States. They were delegates to the Constitutional Convention and they are also known as the “Founding Fathers”.
More information not sure what you mean by “Collect some recent activities in sports” but thanks for the points :)
Answer:
Explanation:
Open-source innovation has not revolutionized and software and biotech industries. It completely changes the way that we think about creativity. To do something new we don't have to do something new we an existing or emerging form, made available through access and do something new with them. This promotes democracy in the innovation game, with open source services against persons or groups or against field or endeavors. The new open-source landscape is a vastly fertile one, with countless possibilities for growth, but its vastness and freedom can also overwhelming.
<u>Here are three key shifts:
</u>
- Passive recipients to active co-creator
- Our culture and our system for customers and emerging opportunities
- Own and protect to share and expand
It is an opinion because it is just someone's view, not a fact that it is better
