Answer:
HI your question is incomplete attached to the answer is an image of the complete question
i) MSG
II) OVER
III) MSE
IV) UNBIASED
Explanation:
MSG ( ) : this is calculated by taking the sample variance of the sample distribution of the mean for every group involved with the test and it unbiased under the null hypothesis alone
while MSE is gotten from using the sample mean of the sample variances of each group involved with the test and it is always unbiased whether or not there is a population / treatment effect
One major difference is the cost. A private attorney costs the defendant money for their services. A public defender is free to people who do not have the means to afford their own attorney. Usually, the defendant does not have a choice with the public defender they are assigned.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
The things that are needed for human solidarity to thrive in a Catholic perspective are the understanding and the compassion of good Catholics to the pain and suffering of other people.
According to the Catholic religious teachings, Catholics must recognize the necessities of other people who are suffering and show the kind of compassion and respect for the events they are living, understanding that God has a purpose for every one of us.
The reasons of the almighty God can be unknown to humans, but he has his motives. Or as the common saying states, "God acts in strange ways."
Catholics are taught that humans form a big community on Earth, and they can help and be part of the solution trying to understand the circumstances of other people, walk in their shows for a while to understand what they are living, to never judge, and lend a helping hand when it is needed.
Answer:
This is an example of Abuse of principle-agent relationship
Explanation:
The death penalty brings some closure to the victim's family and can help them cope with the suffering. Without the death penalty, some criminals would continue to commit crimes. discourage prisoners already serving life sentences from committing more serious crimes.
Among the general population, 64% believe the death penalty for murder is morally justified and 33% believe it is unjust. An overwhelming proportion of those who support the death penalty (90%) says it is morally justified in such circumstances, compared with his 25% of those who oppose it.
The debate over the death penalty has long revolved around morality. Proponents argue that punishment must be commensurate with the crime and that taking a life is worth losing. I claim it can't be done.
Justice requires that society imposes on the criminal the losses that society has imposed on the innocent. By inflicting death on those who deliberately inflict death on others, the death penalty ensures justice for all.
Learn more about the death penalty here brainly.com/question/26633290
#SPJ4
