<h2>Hope this helps you with your homework :)</h2>
Yes, the crime still would have been committed. Falsification of documents and false representations are crimes, irrespective of their consequences.
However. If Mills had paid, Pivowar would never have come to know about the false representation and the case would not have come to court. Whether the case comes to the court or it does not, is an independent factor of whether a crime has been committed.
A crime is an offense punishable by state or other authority. The term crime does not have a simple, generally accepted definition in modern criminal law, but a statutory definition is provided for specific purposes.
Learn more about crime here:brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ4
2. The writer, Ovid, chose that image to show that Midas was greedy and was never satisfied with the treasures he already had. That contributes to the point that Ovid is trying to make in his story because it shows that if one is too greedy, they will eventually lose something important to them.
3. At the end of the story, Bacchus has Midas give a reason for him to show him mercy. He does this to make sure that Midas truly understands that what he did was selfish and that he'd be less greedy in the future.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Unenumerated rights are legal rights inferred from other rights that are implied by existing laws, such as in written constitutions, but are not themselves expressly coded
