Answer:
Rate variance = $250 favorable
Explanation:
<em>The variable overhead rate variance is the difference between the actual variable cost and the standard variable overhead cost the actual actual hours used.</em>
<em>We would compare the actual cost to the standard cost of the actual hours used . This is done below as follows:</em>
$
4,200 hours should have cost (4200 × 3.75 ) 15,750
but did cost <u>15,500</u>
Rate variance <u> 250</u> Favorable
Note the actual hours of 4,200 cost $250 less than it should be have cost . Hence the variance is favorable
Rate variance = $250
Answer:
The correct answer is D) Top management
Explanation:
Top management, as the name implies, consists of those who are at the highest point in the management hierarchy. The most common positions that are part of top managament are, Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO), and Chief Strategist Officer (CSO). They are usually part of the Board of Directors, which answers to the shareholders.
Their task is, as the question specifies, to define the general policy of the company, including goals and strategies to achieve those goals. In a way, companies are just like nations, they have top executives like the president or the president of the senate, who define the direction in which the company/country will go.
Answer:
The portfolio standard deviation is 14.82%
Explanation:
The portfolio standard deviation would be calculated by finding out the variance of the portfolio and taking the square root of it.
Variance of the portfolio = [(1 - .50)
x 0.25] + [0.50 x 0.16] + [2 x (1 - 0.50) x 0.50 x 0.25 x 0.16 x 0]
= [0.25 x 0.0625] + [0.25 x 0.0256] + [0]
= 0.015625 + 0.0064
VarPort = 0.022025
Std DevPort = √0.022025
Std DevPort = 0.1482 = 14.82 percent
Answer:
False
Explanation:
It is 'Incremental cost allocation method' that ranks the individual users of a cost object in order of users most responsible for a common cost (the most responsible will be primary user) and then uses these rankings to allocate the costs among the users (incremental users).
Stand-alone cost allocation method allocates cost proportionately among all users based on a basis which relates to each users proportion of the total. For example the basis could be proportion of sales of responsibility centers to total sales of organization.
in this case, identical changes in autonomous consumption and autonomous government spending: <span> have different effects on equilibrium income
When a factor is implemented and have two different reaction, it is safe to assume that that factor have two different effects.
For example, an increasing interest in technology(autonomous consumption) may increased the investment for tech products. The government spending may not give as much influence in this context because it wont affect the transaction between the customers and the producer
</span>
