Answer:
try 0
Step-by-step explanation:
that your best shot
Answer:
7.50 + 0.12x = 13.02
Charlene spent 46 min on the phone last month
Step-by-step explanation:
First you would do 13.02 - 7.50 = 5.52
Secondly you would do 5.52/0.12 = x
this will give you x= 46
Answer:
A: y < -2x - 1
Step-by-step explanation:
First, to figure out which part of the graph to be looking at, you will look at the shaded region as the solution area.
So, the solution area is to the left of the line. Said line is a dotted line which means that the points on the line can not be a solution.
If the points on the line can not be a solution then it eliminates answer choices C and D because y can not equal the other side of the inequality.
Now, we will bring the shaded region back into focus to find out if y is greater than or less than the other side. The shaded area is "below" the line so it is less than -2x - 1.
To ensure this is correct, plug two points into the inequality we just chose, one from the shaded region and one not, just to make sure the answer is correct.
I picked (-3,4) to test. So plug them into the inequality to get:
4 < -2 (-3) - 1
So 4 < 6 - 1 which is correct.
Then from the other side of the line I picked (5,2)
2 < -2 (5) - 1
2 < -10 - 1
2 < -11 is not true so the inequality that we found was correct.
Answer:
The suitable results are:
Option A: The alternative hypothesis could really be true but because the sample size is small, the power is very low so the researchers are likely to run an experiment whose results lead them to make a type II error.
Option D: Inasmuch there is no statistical evidence to accept the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis could be true and there is no difference between the new and standard treatments survival rate.
Explanation:
Below are the options suitable for results:
Option A: The alternative hypothesis could really be true but because the sample size is small, the power is very low so the researchers are likely to run an experiment whose results lead them to make a type II error - Reason been that, as the sample size increase, so also does the power of the test increase. Therefore, because the power is too small, the researchers are likely to commit type 2 error.
Option D: Inasmuch there is no statistical evidence to accept the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis could be true and there is no difference between the new and standard treatments survival rate.
12) -5k - 19 = 5 - 13k
-5k = 24 - 13k
8k = 24
k = 3
14) -15n + 16 = 86 - 29n
-15n = 70 - 29n
14n = 70
n = 5
16) 13 - 3p = -5(3 + 2p)
13 - 3p = -15 - 10p
-3p = -28 - 10p
7p = -28
p = -4
18) 14a - 93 = 49 - 57a
14a = 142 - 57a
71a = 142
a = 2
20) 8v = 2(4v + 2)
8v = 8v + 4
No solution
22) 2(-4h - 13) = 37 + 13h
-8h - 26 = 37 + 13h
-8h = 63 + 13h
-21h = 63
h = -3
24) 11n - 3 = 9 + 5n
6n = 12
n = 2
26) -9n - 12 = 8 - 4n
-5n - 12 = 8
-5n = 20
n = -4
