<span> Ivan is discussing with two of the monks his article on the position of the ecclesiastical courts. He explains that he opposes the separation of church and state primarily because when a criminal needs to be punished, the public should not have to rely on the state to administer such punishment. Ivan states that if the church had the authority to punish and also to excommunicate the criminal, then a vast number of crimes would be diminished. To a degree, Father Zossima agrees, but he points out that the only effective punishment "lies in the recognition of sin by conscience.</span>
Elie Wiesel believed that commemorating the Holocaust was not a job but an obligation and that the only way to combat lingering apathy worldwide was to share his own narrative as well as the stories of other victims.
Elie Wiesel discusses the shaky link between indifference and humanity throughout "The Perils of Indifference." He thought that those who chose to ignore the suffering and anguish occurring all around the world were endangering the very nature of mankind, and that the pervasive nature of indifference still posed the greatest challenge to a just and enduring peace.
<h3>
What did Elie Wiesel take out from the situation?</h3>
Everyone possesses bravery, faith, hope, and courage, and how they are used has an impact, as Elie Wiesel shows in Night. Elie accomplishes this by using the events that took place in Auschwitz. Everyone forgets to apply these crucial qualities when they are in pain occasionally.
Elie's identity underwent constant change as a result of the horrific events that the Jewish community endured.
To learn more about Elie Wiesel, visit
brainly.com/question/16258201
#SPJ4
When we say despotism, this is the type of system that uses oppressive powers in order to rule a nation. On the other hand, liberalism is the opposite of despotism for this practices liberty or freedom. Based on the given statements above, the one the best shows the difference between these two is the third option. Hope this helps.
