Answer: hey bestie! im so sorry for what i did, or what happened! i want to say im sorry. I really am! i didnt mean what i said and i didnt mean to do it. i know i say sorry so much, but when i say it i mean it. please forgive me. I love u alot and i hope that we can just get over the situation. I want us to become besties again, i dont want u to feel sad for what i did. please believe me. I love u and i hope u accept me. Ur the best thing i have right now, and i dont want to loose you. One last time friend forgive me. Friend please accept me. Friend PLEASE love me again! I love u and i hope u have an good night/day!! - From Y/N
Explanation: their u go!:) also u could've used a different subject like health! but ur good.
The answer euphemism in which it is a form of language that refers to polite, indirect terms that substitute words and phrases deliberated harsh and disrespectful or which suggest somewhat disagreeable. In addition, the opposite of a euphemism is a dysphemism or cacophemism. The dysphemism is a figure of speech which is distinct from the use of critical or offensive expressions as an alternative of inoffensive ones.
Answer:
A) cognitive dissonance
Explanation:
Mrs. Jonas believes strongly that it is important that workers' rights be respected, and that one of the more important ways of doing this is to ensure that all workers be properly documented. She is supervising a contracting company that is building a new warehouse for her company. While doing this she discovers that many of the workers employed by the contractor are undocumented aliens working for well below minimum wage.
Mrs. Jonas is likely experiencing cognitive dissonance. She is experiencing cognitive dissonance, any incompatibility an individual might perceive between two or more attitudes or between behavior and attitudes.In cognitive dissonance , a person who is in a situation to experience contradictory belief, attitudes or ideas
Answer:
The following might have happened if the Founding Fathers had accepted the Articles of Confederation:
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation was the first governing document of the United States. This document did not provide enough powers and authority to the central government. Moreover, the lack of a national army, national currency, national laws weakened the national government. As a result of this, a strong federal government was required. Consequently, a new Constitution was prepared for the United States.
The following might have happened if the Founding Fathers had accepted the Articles of Confederation:
- Various other countries would have attacked the states of the United States.
- The outsiders would have established their autocracy in the states of the U.S. in lack of the national government and national army.
- The states themselves would have tried to establish their control over each other to enlarge their territories.
