Answer:
c. make the norms salient to participants.
Explanation:
Field experiment: In psychological research, the term "field experiment" is described as one of the different studies that utilize "experimental design" that happens in any natural setting. While conducting a field experiment, the experimenter tends to examine or analyze the degree to which the manipulation of a single independent variable causes a change or alteration in the given dependent variable related to the natural environment.
In the question above, the researchers suggest that the specific role of the given confederate in the mentioned study was to make the particular norms salient to participants as it is significantly described that participants will model the confederate's behavior i.e, they will get influenced.
Culture is the answer! Hope this helps!:))
Answer:
Not a single person.
Explanation:
In the essay "I, Pencil" by Leonard E. Read, the author says that though about one and one-half billion pencils are produced in US alone each year, he says that not a single person in the whole earth knows how to actually make a pencil.
The author says that the economy of the country could never be systematically planned when not even a single person possesses the skills to even make a pencil. The writer uses the word 'pencil' to represent the most simplest tool yet how no one actually has the skills to make one in the country.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
