Answer:
Thoughts about Mr. Bedford when he meets Mr. Cavor at Lympne
Explanation:
As I sit here writing in the shadows of vine-leaves beneath the blue sky of southern Italy, it occurs to me with a sense of awe that my involvement in Mr. Cavor's remarkable exploits was, after all, the result of the most innocent chance. It could've been anyone. I got into these things at a time when I felt I was safe from any potentially distressing encounters. I'd gone to Lympne because I considered it to be the most boring spot on the planet. “At the very least, here,” I declared, “I shall find serenity and a chance to work!”
Answer:
Explanation:
not all the time if you want too but i recommend for them to be credited
Well for one, characterisation is how a writer chooses to reveal a characters personality in a story, through things like physical appearance (shiny hair, blue eyes, nice smile, ect.) and through virtues and faults (brave, attentive, smart - egotistical, bitter, evil.)
Figurative language is basically how you'd describe said chracterisations, through things like personification, hyperbole, metaphors, similes, ect.
So with that being said, figurative language can help characterise a monster by doing more than just saying it's a monster; figurative language can make it /feel/ like a monster to the reader. Figurative language can turn the monster '3-D' (for lack of better words), by saying it has long claws, stinky breath, vicious fangs, a horrifying growl, ect.
My favourite example of figurative language is actually in the childrens book "Where the Wild Things Are" by Maurice Sendak, because it uses simple figurative language. Maurice Sendak describes the wild things as so: "They roared their terrible roars and gnashed their terrible teeth and rolled their terrible eyes and showed their terrible claws.'
Anyway, I hope this helped !! :-)
The correct answer is A) participle. It is a past participle, used as adjective broken in this sentence.
Answer is B to my knowledge
