Why did Romans create a written code of law, The correct option is B to allow citizens to see and understand the law
<h3>
What does Roman law actually mean?</h3>
The traditional law and legislation of the assemblies, resolutions of the senate, enactments of the emperors, edicts of the praetors, and writings of the jurisconsults.
And the codes of the later emperors serve as the foundation for the ancient Roman legal system, which includes both written and unwritten law.
Hence the correct answer is option B.
Learn more about the roman Law:
brainly.com/question/13741410
#SPJ1
Answer: What motives were behind the Monroe Doctrine? The Monroe Doctrine was drafted because the U.S. government was worried that European powers would encroach on the U.S. sphere of influence by carving out colonial territories in the Americas.
Explanation:
The most important motivation for colonists than the ones suggested is to make money.
<h3>Who are colonists?</h3>
Colonist are members of a government group that settles in a new country or region.
The people brings innovations and new idea and the original settler of a colony·
The colonist had the opportunity to make money, there are business opportunities that is brought it though them into this country in which they firm key stakeholder having there own share of the business.
They are mostly motivated for the colonization of the New World because they see opportunity to make more money.
Therefore, the most important motivation for colonists than the ones suggested is to make money.
Learn more on colonists below
brainly.com/question/24736605
#SPJ1
Answer:
What do peasant farmers do when they lost their crops?
Peasant farmers often depended on <em>subsistence agriculture</em> - this means that the farmers primarily grew crops to feed themselves and their families, rather than selling their crops for economic gain.
So, if the peasant farmers lose their crops, they will have nothing to eat. The peasants will probably go hungry and perhaps starve.
And what common pattern do we see when the masses are starving? They <em>revolt </em>! I suppose that's a bit of a stretch, but in general, the peasant class would definitely be upset at having no crops to feed themselves and their children. Such tensions will be directed at their leader or "King" who is supposed to be prepared for any disaster.
Wouldn't people think, "The leader has everything he wants and can get anything he does not have, can't he share with us?"
Anyways, that's how I would interpret this question.
Hope this helps!
:D
