1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
saveliy_v [14]
3 years ago
14

How do we know that Pacal the great was a successful and influential mayan leader?

History
1 answer:
Helga [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Also known as Pacal and Pacal the Great, he is most successful for raising the city of Palenque (known as B'aakal) from relative obscurity to a great power, his building projects in the city (especially the Temple of the Inscriptions), and his elaborately in Mexico.

Explanation:

I hope this helps you lmk but don't lmk if it doesn't

You might be interested in
Why did many americans support the british in the war even though the united states was officially neutral?
eduard
The British news oscillated the American public opinion(s) in favor of the Allies. They also had like cultural 'bonds' too.
5 0
3 years ago
Why would Americans have been angered by the Zimmermann note? *
Yanka [14]
The telegram was considered perhaps Britain's greatest intelligence coup of World War I and, coupled with American outrage over Germany's resumption of unrestricted submarine warfare, was the tipping point persuading the U.S. to join the war
4 0
3 years ago
Write a 100-word speech about who is a good servant leader.​
lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

The concept of servant leadership was developed by Robert Greenleaf in 1970. According to him, servant leadership was based on the philosophy that for leaders to be effective, they must have the passion to serve others. He was disturbed by the many instances where leaders wanted to lead or become leaders first so as to serve people.

His argument was that if people and organizations were to put service first, they were able to transform the world and make it a better place to live.

He argued that servant leadership was the key to the realization of a world with justice; a world where people were not driven by their self interests but the desire and passion to stand for those who are oppressed and those who are not able to articulate their feelings in a highly competitive and biased world.

Kurt Lewin outlined three broad categories of leadership namely autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire. These types of leadership are distinguished by the characteristics of the leaders and the techniques they use in their leadership.

The autocratic type of leadership is characterized by failure to share power with others. In an organizational context, autocratic leaders are the sole decision makers and they perceive the other employees simply as objects which are not capable of making any decision.

Democratic leadership is the opposite of autocratic leadership. This leadership is sometimes referred to as participative leadership because the leaders lead through bringing everybody on board in decision making with the idea that inclusiveness brings about sustainability as far as realization of organizational goals and objectives is concerned. With this style, all members of the team are involved in identifying essential goals and strategies for attaining those goals.

Servant leadership falls under the category of democratic leadership which is characterized by the inclusion of everybody in making decisions which affect their work and their organizations at large.

The laissez-faire type of leadership is actually not leadership at all because people just do as they wish. This type of leadership lacks a central authority responsible for making decisions. It is rare to find organizations with this type of leadership today.

5 0
2 years ago
Why was there opposition to Soviet control in Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1968.
Leviafan [203]
2 heheh tue vene va entro sms se ti ha ah ha al il
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the early 1800s, people believed that only a select group could be absolved of their sins. How did these beliefs change durin
svlad2 [7]

The correct option is C) Ministers believed that all people could renew their faith and cure their evils.

The Second Great Awakening was a religious reform movement of the 19th century. The Protestant religious revival movement believed that people could cure evil by renewing their faith

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which revolution led to increases in global food
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP !!!!!!!!!​
    13·1 answer
  • How do candidates for public office, especially at the state and national level, use the media to get elected?
    15·2 answers
  • For which group of americans did the delcaration of independence raise hopes
    13·1 answer
  • All of the following are examples of the Environment element of the Six Essential Elements of Geography except
    7·1 answer
  • The colonies create the first _________ and established ______________.
    9·1 answer
  • Which was not a consequence of the Protestant Reformation?
    14·1 answer
  • Why might Britain's plan to leave 10,000 troops in America concern the colonists?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of Congress’s powers is implied through the necessary and proper clause?
    13·1 answer
  • What did the Supreme Court say in its ruling in Wabash v. Illinois (1885)?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!