1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Usimov [2.4K]
3 years ago
6

2. The Constitution cannot be changed on a whim; a lot of people have to work together for an amendment to be ratified. Why do y

ou think it's necessary to make amending the Constitution such an involved process?
History
2 answers:
bulgar [2K]3 years ago
7 0

Explanation:

The Constitution of the United States was ratified in 1789, making it 229 years old, the oldest constitution in the modern world.

As the United States has continued to grow and face unique challenges brought on through modern warfare, alliances, and technology, some critics have argued that the Framers of the Constitution could not have foreseen the changes the United States would experience. What can we do to update the Constitution to address these new issues? Well, the Framers thought of a solution: citizens could add changes to the Constitution.

The Framers added a process for amending, or changing, the Constitution in Article V. Since 1789, the United States has added 27 amendments to the Constitution. An amendment is a change to the Constitution. The first ten amendments to the Constitution became known as the Bill of Rights. These first amendments were designed to protect individual rights and liberties, like the right to free speech and the right to trial by jury.Article V describes the process for amending the Constitution. But the Framers intended for the amendment process to be difficult: although the federal government could add amendments, three-fourths of states have to ratify every amendment.

“The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.”

shusha [124]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The constitution is made up of a lot of people.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What are the major forms of local government in the united states?
WARRIOR [948]
Counties, municipalities, townships, school districts, and special districts
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was Mesopotamia an ideal place for a civilization to develop
Fynjy0 [20]
Because it was near rivers and other geographical advantages.
4 0
3 years ago
Where did human get most the deadly
Svetach [21]

Answer:

it will be option C. bats

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which event best connects to this theme?
sladkih [1.3K]

Both Mr. Poole and Mr. Utterson have a bad feeling

about Mr. Hyde

Explanation:

<u>Both Mr Poole and Mr, Utterson have bad feelings and intuitions about Mr Hyde but brush it off earlier on in the story</u>.

<u>This does not bode well for them</u> as they did not really understand the predicament with the Jekyll and Mr Hyde, but had they followed their gut they might not have had to feel the brunt of it anyway as they would be far away from the damages that would be inflicted upon the, This is how this overarching theme is expressed.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“The press has too long basked in a white world, looking out of it, if at all, with white men’s eyes and a white perspective.”
beks73 [17]
It means that throughout history one main perspective or viewpoint has been shown off or presented as fact while others have been ignored. The Caucasian perspective. However this quote is also an opinion and should NOT be taken as fact.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • why were people unhappy with their government? why did they believe that Revolution was the only way to make the change they wan
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the changes brought to world populations as a result of the European colonization of the A
    15·1 answer
  • At "show" trials during the Great Purge suspects often
    7·1 answer
  • What factors led to the united states technological boom?
    6·1 answer
  • Please define the following terms, using the book a history of Middle East
    14·1 answer
  • What was the main reason for the Kingdom of Axum's success and growth?
    12·2 answers
  • Who was the wisest man according to the Bible
    13·1 answer
  • What type of religion did the Kush follow?
    5·2 answers
  • Which best states Thomas Jefferson’s position toward the conflict between Great Britain and Napoleon’s France?
    13·2 answers
  • India both benefited from and was harmed by British colonial
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!