Answer:
N=-5
Step-by-step explanation:
She spent 10 minutes. 25% x 40 = 10.
Answer:
91
Step-by-step explanation:
Two similar polygons, means a similarity would exist in both polygons
- Perimeter of a rectangle = 2(l +w)
- Perimeter of the larger rectangle = 36 (because it's the largest figure)
- equation becomes 36 = 2(L + W)
- since L = 14, it becomes = 36 = 2(14 +W)
- 36 = 28 + 2W
- 2W = 36 - 28 = 2w = 8
Now we assume that since the rectangles are similar, they would have similar dimensions, in this case Width. so with this, we find length of smaller rectangle.
- 21 = 2(L + 4) = 21 = 2L + 8
lastly the product of the length of both polygons = 14 * 6.5 = 91.
Their Products length is 91
The expression for g(x) is wrong, you skipped some signs and, apparentely, some parentheses. The rigtht expression for g(x) should be g(x) = 3(x+1) + 4. Note that g(x) = 3(x+1) + 4 it is the same that f(x+1) + 4. When you add a number to the argument, the graph of function is shifted that number of units to the left; and when you add a number to the function the graph shifts that number of units up. Therefore, the steps that will translate f(x) = 3x to g(x) = 3(x+1) + 4 is shift f(x) one unit to the left and four units up.
For the answer to the question on w<span>hich steps will translate f(x) = 3x to g(x) = 3x + 1 + 4? The answer to this question is
</span>f(x) = 3x one unit to the left and four units up
