Leah claims that these figures are not similar. When she compared the heights, she wrote 27. Then she compared the bases and got
1 answer:
Answer:
<h2>Leah is actually wrong, because those rectangles are similar.</h2>Step-by-step explanation:
Remember that similarity is about having proportional sides and congruent angles. When we have congruent sides, then those rectangles are congruent not similar.
In this case, to find the similarity, Leah should compare bases and heights thorugh division, because the ratio between heights and the ratio between bases must be equal. So, let's divide.
As you can observe, both ratios are equal.
Therefore, those rectangles are congruent.
You might be interested in
The present value of an annuity is given by
where: PV is the current value of the annuity, P is the periodic payment, r is the apr, t is the number of compounding in one year and n is the number of years.
Thus, given that PV = $51,800; r = 7.8% = 0.078; t = 12; n = 4.
Therefore, the <span>monthly payment is $1,259.73</span>
where: PV is the current value of the annuity, P is the periodic payment, r is the apr, t is the number of compounding in one year and n is the number of years.
Thus, given that PV = $51,800; r = 7.8% = 0.078; t = 12; n = 4.
Therefore, the <span>monthly payment is $1,259.73</span>