The Special Court of Appeals’ arguments that Dabney could not commit attempted fourth-degree burglary is that thinking of the crime does not make you a criminal and thus, the defendant can not be convicted of a non-exsitence crime.
<h3>What is the case of Dabney v. State?</h3>
The defender "Dabney" was convicted for attempt 4th degree burglary but appealed on the grounds he did not actually commit it.
Hence, he could not be convicted of actus reus of being on the property no criminal significance in its own right absent the mens rea of an intent to commit theft.
Read more about Dabney v. State
brainly.com/question/26537644
#SPJ1
Answer: Jessica = Embezzlement
Jake = Forgery
Both = Conspiracy
Explanation:
• Jessica,s crime is embezzlement.
Embezzlement is when an individual misappropriates the fund that has been entrusted and placed in the person's care. In this case, Jessica steals the company's fund that is in her possession and this is a financial fraud.
• Jake's crime is forgery
Forgery is when a take signature, false document, or something else is being copied so as to deceive someone else. This is punishable as the person will be charged with fraud.
• The crime of both of them is conspiracy.
A conspiracy is simply when there is an agreement that takes place between two or more people when they want to commit a crime. In this scenario, both Jake and Jessica agreed to carry out the fraud.
Answer:
Explanation:
Jurors perform a vital role in the American system of justice. ... Jury service is a high duty of citizenship. Jurors aid in the maintenance of law and order and uphold justice among their fellow citizens. Their greatest reward is the knowledge that they have discharged this duty faithfully, honorably, and well.
