Answer:
There are no options listed, but what I can tell you for sure is that John's actions were both unethical and illegal.
What John did is unethical because it is not moral and it goes against all the principles that guide professional conduct. John also did something illegal because he was an accomplice in committing fraud against the company. He knowingly benefited from the accountant's illegal actions, and that is basically the legal definition of an accomplice to a crime.
Answer:
Estimating un-collectible accounts expense improves the matching of revenues and expenses.
Explanation:
When uncollectibles are recorded through allowance method then, bad debts expense is provided, which reduces net income. But at the time of writing off only the allowance and accounts receivables account is affected and not the net income.
When direct method is used then also the net income gets reduced, as bad debt expense and accounts receivables is affected.
And as provided in first para, when estimating and creating the allowance for bad debts, it affects net income, and it also represents the true and fair view of expenses and income.
Thus, statement c is correct.
The gift to the grandaughter is <span>Partially shielded by the annual gift tax exclusion. In the year of 2016, the federal government created </span><span>the </span>estate<span> and gift </span>tax exemption<span> is $5.45 million per individual.
Which means that the inheritence that given to the granddaughter would be tax free as long as it does not surpass the net value of 5.45 million.</span>
If a government is trying to encourage economic growth, they would do all of these things except raise taxes. Raising taxes has the opposite effect and will slow growth because it takes more money out of the economy that could be used for growth and expansion.
