Answer:
C. Yes, since the mistake would be obvious to a reasonable person.
Explanation:
A unilateral mistake <u>occurs when only one party is mistaken as to the subject matter</u> or the terms contained in the contract agreement.
<u>The general rule involving unilateral mistakes is that, if the non-mistaken party either knew or should have known of the other party's mistake, the mistake is a “palpable unilateral mistake” which makes the contract voidable</u> by the mistaken party.
Therefore, since Vinny's mistake would have been obvious to the other party, it could make the contract voidable and relieve the store of the liability.
Answer:
A) it was engaged in foreign direct investment.
Explanation:
Foreign Direct Investment is a term used in business-related operations that describes a kind of investment made by an investor in a country other than the actual or original country of the investor. It can be either business operations or business assets in a different firm in another country.
Hence, in this case, when a Japanese automaker, built a factory in Ohio, it was engaged in foreign direct investment. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.
Answer:
Total Stockholders' equity was affected.
Explanation:
Stock dividend refers to distributing shares free of cost among the existing shareholders. Such a dividend does not result in resources flowing out of the entity but merely reassign amounts from retained earnings to other equity accounts. Thus, such a dividend does not affect the total equity of the stockholders. This can be seen through the following entry,
Retained Earnings $1,800,000 Dr
Common Stock, at par $1,200,000 Cr
Paid in Capital in excess
of par, Common Stock $600,000 Cr
The above transaction shows that we just redistributed the reserves by reducing retained earning by the value of stock dividend 1800000 [( 800000*0.15) * $15] and adding it to the Common Stock 1200000 [(800000*0.15) * 10] and to paid in capital in excess of par 600000 [(800000*0.15) * 5].
Answer:
In a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, a class of creditors is considered to have accepted the bankruptcy plan when:
one-half of the class in number and two-thirds of the class in dollar amount agree.
Explanation:
In a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, the business assets are liquidated to pay the creditors. In a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the business assets are not liquidated. Instead, the business is refinanced as the assets and debts are reorganized, making it possible for the continued existence of the business. This is the reason the agreement of the creditors are usually paramount in the decision to undergo a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, unlike a Chapter 7 bankruptcy.
Answer:
<h2>include the following week I have a a but this is the real account of Finn have a great day today with my mom said you didn't want me there was an accident in the middle of nowhere near as much </h2>
Explanation:
that my answer po
