Indonesia
is the country with the largest population of Muslims
Answer:
To force the government to repay its debts after Mexican President Benito Juarez decided that they weren't going to.
Answer:
Short answer YES
Explanation:
Because law by its very nature concerns moral judgments, a government that stands under the rule of law presupposes the existence of a moral order, expresses the social concept of that order, and in turn encourages the fundamental moral principles of a society, particularly regarding justice. Sustaining limited government and freedom turns on the question of how virtue is cultivated and which communities and institutions are most appropriate for this task.Such a shift in the public's attitude toward expansive government can weaken democracy, given that diversification of authority among local associations is a strong check against government tyrannyAll political communities, including nation-states, are held together by civic bonds or "ties that bind." As the motto of the United States-e pluribus unum,or "out of many, one" -implies, the kinds of obligations that unite its many members into one people are of critical importance. These bonds often take the form of moral obligations that we owe one another as members of the same community.National governments do not, for example, attract citizens to the good of compassion with the same power as other social institutions because they bind citizens to a sovereign state, or to an impersonal law, rather than to other citizens directly. desires to bind its "many" into "one" to limit its power and its purse, leaving primary responsibility for moral formation in the hands of local moral communities. Only these associations and institutions can foster true justice and compassion for those in need-a fact that makes them essential for the cultivation of virtuous citizens and the prevention of governmental tyranny.
The answer has to be Its c the other ones dont make sence
Abolitionists were angered by the Dred Scott decision, which they considered a method for the Supreme Court to put an end to the debate about slavery in the territories Hence option B
<h3>
What was Dred Scott's Decision?</h3>
The Dred Scott decision was a March 6, 1857 opinion by the United States Supreme Court that being in a free state or territory did not entitle an enslaved individual, Dred Scott, to his freedom. Scott, being someone's property, was not a citizen, and hence could not sue in federal court, according to the verdict.
So, in the aforementioned facts, northerners were disappointed with the Dred Scott verdicts since they said that slavery would become legal everywhere.
Learn more about Dred's decisions:
brainly.com/question/23987166
#SPJ1
