Answer:Lindsey exhibits Conspicuous Consumption
Explanation:
Conspicuous consumption refers to how an individual will spend a lot of money in order to have luxurious material that will show people that they hold a high economic status. They want to maintain a high social status that will make them look fancy and rich which is very likely to earn them some respects and a number of fans.
Lindsey wants respect amongst her peers and as result he buys an expensive car hence she is very likely to look cool and expands her social life as most young people get attracted to a luxurious lifestyle.
Piece of a jar is that better
duh i mean if this is history then don't you think it is about people against people like really
Options :
a. the popularity of Domino's Pizza in Italy
b. the preference for local hamburgers from a local chain, Jollibee's, in Philippines
c. the growing number of McDonald's restaurants globally
d. the increased sales of soups and noodles in Thailand
e. popularity of Chinese foods in Taiwan
Answer: c. the growing number of McDonald's restaurants globally
Explanation: Cultural dictation in the preference of food refers to an individual's inclination to the type of food usually adopted or consumed in one's region. This is usually natural since these type of diets are what is being consumed from a very tender age. However, as development and growth occurs, people get know about other food types, dietary and nutritional benefits of various food types, thus allowing individuals to make choices based on nutritional Dividends one may derive from the consumption of certain diets. People are starting to opt for diets or food containing more nutritional and healthier supplements supplements. One of the evidences could be derived when there is a surge in the number of foreign kitchens in regions where it doesn't exist before. The surge could be termed to mean that demand for these diets are starting to converge. Such as the global increase in the number of McDonald's restaurants.
That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
I’m guessing b.market failure i’m not 100% sure though. sorry!