-25.65 - 16.5 + 12.45 = -29.7......he is now at 29.7 ft below the surface
We know that angle MKJ is comprised of angle MKL and angle LKJ. That means if we add MKL and LKJ, we should get 80 degrees, which is the measure of angle MKJ.

So, we know that our x is 15. That is not enough to tell whether KL is an angle bisector, because we have to evaluate both MKL and LKJ with x=15, so:

So we see that these two angles are actually bisectors, and the third question best describes this phenomenon.
Answer:
it may be B but I think it's C
Step-by-step explanation:
not sure if this is right, but I would say not congruent. it may be sas but in order for it to be sas then the Angle must be in-between the two congruent sides