Answer:
His veto of the Civil Rights Act of 1866
Explanation:
The Radical Republicans in Congress were angered by Johnson's actions. They refused to allow Southern representatives and senators to take their seats in Congress. In 1866, the Congress passed the Civil Rights Bill, which granted African Americans equal protection under the law with whites. The Congress also renewed the Freedmen's Bureau in 1866. President Johnson vetoed both of these bills, but the Congress overturned both vetoes. Following the congressional elections of 1866, the Republican Party controlled more than two-thirds of the seats in both houses of Congress. As a result of the Republican election victory, the Congress now dictated how the reconstruction of the Union would proceed.
The first action the Republican majority took was to enact the First Reconstruction Act, in spite of Johnson's veto
Answer:
The war between the two-person was inevitable for several reasons.
Explanation:
In the Middle East, during 1952, there was turbulence among Arabs for a requirement of leadership. The gap filled by Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt. Over many years his ideas and evolutionary zeal have provoked French, British, and pro-Western monarchies.
With the death of Nasser in 1970, there was a sudden race for the leadership among the Middle Eastern leaders. Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini of Iran and President Saddam Hussein of Iraq were among them.
Saddam Hussein advocate progress under the secularism. He believes that a dictatorial government that force modernization is a shortcut to progress.
Ayatollah Khomeini believed that the Middle East controlled by foreign powers. His opinions and ideologies opposed to Saddam Hussein. Ayatollah urged the Shia of Iraq to overthrow his government.
Saddam Hussein invaded Iran in September 1980 where his attack led to forecast Iraq as the new leading power. Saddam led the war between Iraq and Iran for eight-year.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that they want people in positions of political power who will represent their best interests when making laws. </span></span><span />
