Which conclusion is supported by the American public's shifting opinions about the Panama Canal over the course of the 20th cent
ury? A. People's points of view are unlikely to shift greatly unless their biases are first removed. B. Historians cannot determine an event's true historical context until years after it is no longer relevant. C. Even a period of only a few decades can greatly change the historical context surrounding an event. D. While people may change their political opinions, they rarely change their significant points of view.
The correct answer is <span>C. Even a period of only a few decades can greatly change the historical context surrounding an event.
It showed how fast the public opinion can change. Originally Panamanians were supportive of the canal and the policies regarding it in relations to the United States, but very soon they started disagreeing with them and wanting the United States to give the canal ownership and control back to Panama who wanted to remove itself from relations with the US.</span>
The law in which prohibited the marriage between racial
groups that led to pacific islanders into marrying people in the tribal
communities was because of the anti miscegenation law. This law had enforced
racial segregation in which marriage or relationships are prohibited in races
that are different.
