There is no map.
Please post it for further assistance.
<u>Answer:
</u>
George and his team are using their conceptual skills.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- From the narration given of the topics being discussed in the meeting that George has held with his team, it is clear that they are speaking about the concepts that they can potentially plan to work on in the coming future.
- They are talking about the areas that are open for them and what actions taken would benefit them in the future.
- To make the discussion more fruitful and decisive, the team members are using their conceptual skills.
Answer:
Extinction
Explanation:
In terms of psychology, extinction refers to the progressive weakening of a conditioned response that results in a reduction or absence of the behavior. it explains why a prior conditioned behavior of an organism would eventually stop and it can be observed in both classical conditioning and operant conditioning. As per the question, the extinction signifies stopping of the saliva of the dog in absence of reinforcement of the behavior.
In this definition, distinctive means in the same situation, people will react differently. Characteristic in this definition means the stability (consistency) of the thoughts, behavior, and feelings of a person overtime and in different kind of situations.
In psychology, personality is defined as distinct differences in characteristic sequence of feeling, behaving and thinking.
Answer: This isn't really understood, because not all societies formed governments in the sense of western hierarchical systems, and not all governments formed under the same conditions. It is one of those mysteries, which means it was a gradual thing, and not a sudden seasonal change from anarchy to government. The first government accumulated within a group of people who spoke the same language, and there was some pressure on them that required some level of organization for the distribution of resources and labor, so it seems, but even as I write this I know that is far too simple.
For thousands of years it was believed there was a natural hegemony bestowed by divine power, then, there was the American Revolution and the idea of government was turned upside down. Following that was Karl Marx, who suggested that government was a mechanism of oppression to control the means of production and wealth accumulation, but all of the hypotheses built from this idea, which most of modern thinking can find some degree of lineage to, are problematic to be nice, and outright failures at the other extreme.
Quick answer is, there are a thousand answers, none of which have proven to be universal, so they are only partially right.
There is a lot of room for research in this area.