Based on the thoughts of Keven, we can infer that this is a<u> hasty generalization fallacy. </u>
<h3>What is a hasty generalization fallacy?</h3>
- Coming to a conclusion about a population based on observations from a very small sample size.
- It is usually false and overblown.
Kevin came to his decision based on the small sample size of his grandparents alone. They are simply too small to account for the millions of older people out there.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on hasty generalization at brainly.com/question/1580820.
<u> </u><u>The therapist </u><u>is solely responsible for </u><u>setting</u><u> </u><u>treatment goals</u><u>.</u> All of the following are functions of the behavior therapist, except: to provide a direct and therapist run therapeutic environment.
What is the function of the behavior therapist ?
The main goal of behavior therapy is: eliminating maladaptive learning and providing for more effective learning.
What is the role of the client in behavioral therapy?
- In between sessions, clients complete assignments and carry out experiments.
- These elements are used to determine whether a person is change-ready and to encourage engagement in the change.
- For CBT or any other treatment to be effective in preventing further criminal behavior, a willingness to change is required.
Which of the following is one of the criticisms of behavior therapy?
It only relieves some symptoms of schizophrenia but does not treat the overall disorder. You just studied 56 terms!.
Learn more about behavior therapist
brainly.com/question/9360511
#SPJ4
Answer:
4. representative government
Explanation:
According to my research on the different principles that exist within the American law system, It can be said that based on the information provided within the question, the protesters most likely believe that the government violated the representative government principle. This term is defined as the principle in which officials representing a group of people are elected by those same people. Unlike the situation described within the question where large corporations are seemingly placing people into the government for their benefit.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Anselm argued that an ideal being is important to exist. during this argument God is an excellent being thus he should exist that is understood because of the ontological argument. Guanilo thought this argument was absurd and he viewed the other. one thing doesn't exist simply because it's excellent and he used the instance of an ideal island. The island is ideal thus in step with Anselm's view it ought to exist however the island stop to exist thus Guanilo planned this argument to be reductio ad absurdum. as compared they each agree that as a result, of one thing is ideal it doesn't exist however in distinction saint believed that God was an exception to the present because God is a whole totally different matter and Gaunilo doesn't believe God is an exception to the present view, though he Guanilo believes in God he doesn't consider the ontological argument as proof of Gods existence.
