During the 1896 presidential election, Democratic candidate William Jennings Bryant argued that the government should generate a money supply based on silver instead of gold like it had been previously.
Answer:
Initially, Department of State officials and Bush’s foreign policy team were reluctant to speak publicly about German “reunification” due to fear that hard-liners in both the German Democratic Republic (GDR) and the Soviet Union would stymie reform. Although changes in the GDR leadership and encouraging speeches by Gorbachev about nonintervention in Eastern Europe boded well for reunification, the world was taken by surprise when, during the night of November 9, 1989, crowds of Germans began dismantling the Berlin Wall—a barrier that for almost 30 years had symbolized the Cold War division of Europe. By October 1990, Germany was reunified, triggering the swift collapse of the other East European regimes.
Thirteen months later, on December 25, 1991, Gorbachev resigned and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics dissolved. President Bush and his chief foreign policy advisers were more pro-active toward Russia and the former Soviet republics after the collapse of the Communist monolith than while it was teetering. In a series of summits during the next year with the new Russian President Boris Yeltsin, Bush pledged $4.5-billion to support economic reform in Russia, as well as additional credit guarantees and technical assistance.
The two former Cold War adversaries lifted restrictions on the numbers and movement of diplomatic, consular, and official personnel. They also agreed to continue the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty negotiations (START), begun before the collapse of the Soviet Union, which set a goal of reducing their strategic nuclear arsenals from approximately 12,000 warheads to 3,000-3,500 warheads by 2003. In January 1993, three weeks before leaving office, Bush traveled to Moscow to sign the START II Treaty that codified those nuclear reductions.
Alot because its certain things christians dont do
Answer:(C)
Explanation:(C) is your answer
The text analysis of the given text is given below:
The credibility of the source is one that seems to be unbiased.
There is a slight bias on the part of the author as he seems to side with the South in keeping slavery with the use of the words, "it did not work out so well for the South..."
<h3>What is a Text Analysis?</h3>
This refers to the careful reading, understanding, and examination of a text to pick out the important points being used by the author,
Hence, we can see that the argument made by the narrator talks about the origin of the US Civil War and he says it was because of the abolition of slavery and the opposition of the South to ending slavery because they benefitted greatly from it.
Read more about text analysis here:
brainly.com/question/24441082
#SPJ1
