They did this by accepting who they were and where they lived. They had to as many others did not appreciate the colonials. To prevent uprisings like bacon's, chesapeake gentry found ways to assists middling and poor whites by gradually reducing taxes and encouraging them to use slave labor, allowed yeomen/tenants to vote and in turn expected them to elect planters to office and defer their rule, elite used their control over house of burgesses to limit the power of the royal government and hundreds of yeomen farmers benefited by getting a taste of political power and garnering substantial fees and salaries and deputy chiefs, road surveyors, etc.
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Desafortunadamente, se te olvidó incluir las alternativas o las opciones para poder responder la pregunta.
Como se te olvidó anexar las alternativas, lo único que podemos hacer por ti es comentar lo siguiente, basándonos en nuestro conocimiento sobre el tema.
En la actualidad, la República de Chile se sostiene sobre las ideas de Montesquieu. En ese sentido, cada "poder" es representado por una institución. La relación entre "poder" e institución, bajo los conceptos de Montesquieu se basa en el equilibrio de las facultades y la influencia de poder entre cada uno de las tres divisiones del gobierno federal.
Esa es precisamente la característica principal del modelo de gobierno propuesto por el brillante filósofo y pensador Montesquieu.
Barón de Montesquieu, gran representante dela época de la Ilustración, recomendó que los modernos sistemas de gobierno tuvieran una clara división de poderes.
Una rama el el Poder Ejecutivo, que recae en un Presidente que tiene a su cargo un gabinete de expertos en distintas áreas. Otra rama es el Poder Legislativo, tan bien llamado Congreso. Este Congreso tendrá la facultad de crear, votar y vetar leyes. Su prioridad es crear leyes que beneficien al pueblo. La tercer rama del gobierno es un Poder Judicial, un sistema de justicia que sea imparcial y pueda declarar la inconstitucionalidad de alguna ley.
The answer is <u>David Lloyd George.</u>
The mentioned conference was the Versailles Peace Conference that took place in 1919, after the world war I. It set the peace terms for vanquished Germany.
David Lloyd George, a Prime Minister of Britain, was one of the three great statesmen at the Conference. He found himself in the middle, between an American President who proposed peaceful negotiations to a long-lasting peace in Europe, that included not only to go easier on Germany but also conditions for all countries involved (Disarmament, free trade, freedom of the seas, open diplomacy, etc) and the Prime Minister of France, who wanted a ruthless revenge and to weaken Germany so it'd never be able to invade another country again.
George's personal view was to make justice, but not revenge, to impose some reparations on Germany, but not be too harsh on them to the point that it ruined their economy since eventually, Europe would have to reconcile with Germany and ruining its economy would affect others nation's economies as well. He was also concerned that the Communist of the Russian Revolution of 1917 would spread west, so the treaty should leave Germany strong enough to stop them.
He tried his best to persuade the other leaders on this, but others British politicians wanted harsh reparations as well.
Though the treaty resulting was certainly harsh on Germany, it is believed that it could've been worse if George hasn't had tried to get to a halfway point between U.S. and France.
Answer:
Explanation:C "Developing Nuclear power outside the zone" so it doesn't even involve the area, and the other options have things that would put nuclear material in that zone. whilst Nuclear Power is completely different that a weapons testing either way even if it was in the zone.
