The answer is informational social influence or also known as social proof. This is a mental and social marvel where individuals accept the activities of others trying to reflect remedy conduct in a given situation.This additionally viewed as noticeable in uncertain social circumstances where individuals can't decide the fitting method of conduct, and is driven by the supposition that the encompassing individuals have more information about the present circumstance.
Answer: EXCEPT all of the goals reflect the same specific topic.
Explanation: When setting goals, it is important to follow some set of guidelines such as setting realistic and achievable goals; the goals are specific; the goals are flexible and can be easily modified.
It's unimportant if the goals are not closely related. For example, I want to practice piano for 6 hours daily and also run 5 kilometres, these are two goals that can be achieved in a day and not important to be related.
Answer:
ExplanationHawkins launched her own electoral career by campaigning as a consumer advocate. In 1972, she became the first woman elected to statewide office in Florida by winning a seat on the Florida Public Service Commission. In 1974, she was an unsuccessful candidate for the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate. The nomination went to businessman Jack Eckerd, who then lost the general election to the Democrat Richard B. Stone. The seat was vacated by the retiring one-term Republican Edward Gurney, with whom Hawkins and others in the Florida party had quarreled in the past. In 1976, Hawkins was reelected to the Public Services Commission despite the Jimmy Carter victory in Florida over U.S. President Gerald R. Ford, Jr. In 1978, she was the Republican candidate for lieutenant governor on the ticket headed by her former intraparty rival Jack Eckerd. They lost to then-State Senator Bob Graham and State Representative Wayne Mixson. In 1980, she defeated former Congressman Bill Gunter to win election to the United States Senate; she was Florida's first woman elected to:
Acquittal by Jury. because the Jury did want to examine the case but, later found the defendant not guilty.
