1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergio [31]
3 years ago
7

Sometimes the motivations for large protests organized by college activists are criticized. Highly organized and attended protes

ts in Washington, D.C., are seen as "spring break" for activists, who take part more for an escape and to belong to something than for anything else. What theory would support this critique?
Social Studies
2 answers:
jonny [76]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Mass society theory

Explanation:

Sometimes the motivations for large protests organized by college activists are criticized. Highly organized and attended protests in Washington, D.C., are seen as "spring break" for activists, who take part more for an escape and to belong to something than for anything else. What theory would support this critique?

Mass society theory is one of the earliest theories of social movement, mass society theory is a social movement that attract socially isolated people(individuals) seeking a sense of identity and purpose, it argue that individual in a large society who feel insignificant are brought together by a sense of belonging in which movement member would not have as an individual.

Mass society is a complex concept that it basic idea might be used by extremist movement to lure venerable individual

ideologically this concept of mass society has been used by conservative thinkers and other organisation of the society to express dismay about it process that individuals who partook in protests are just people who are socially isolated with no sense of actual commitment but for significant sake and sense of belonging.

Zinaida [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

1,3,5,6

Explanation:

Just took the assignment

You might be interested in
Assuming that the null hypothesis is true, the ______________ is the probability of observing a value of the test statistic that
zubka84 [21]

Answer:

p-value                                                                                                  

Explanation:

p-value: In statistics, the term p-value is defined as the probability of getting the observed results of a particular test, which leads to the assumption that the null hypothesis of the research or test is correct. p-value describes the level of marginal significance that underlies in a statistical hypothesis test that represents an event's occurrence probability.

In any of the statistical analyses, if the p-value is considered as less than 0.05 then the null hypothesis is being rejected and it is explained that there's no seen difference between two different means and hence a conclusion is made describing that a significant difference exists.

In the question above, the statement signifies the significance of the p-value.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why all individual are different?​
Amanda [17]

Answer:

Because of the different genes in their DNA(Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid).

Explanation:

Many differences between individuals are undoubtedly because of differences in their genes.

7 0
3 years ago
In a paragraph of 4-7 sentences, explain the Great Compromise as if you were one of the patriots there in that time.
lions [1.4K]

July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.

6 0
3 years ago
Which leader served as a civil rights attorney for the NAACP?
inysia [295]

Answer:

Im going to go with A

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plz help me thank u plzzzzz
stiv31 [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Causes of the American Revolutionary War! In a nutshell the British wanted to make as much money as possible out of the 13 Colonies. Great Britain was the 'mother country' - refer to Colonialism. Many of the colonists came from Great Britain, they shared the same ideals and the same king. The British had the power to enact various laws in Parliament outside of America which significantly effected life and trade in the 13 colonies. But the British Laws were used like a 'one-way street' - the Acts of Parliament benefited the British but not the colonies and, to compound this, the Americans were not afforded the same rights as the British people, nor did they have any representatives in the British Parliament to present their points of view. The colonists protested and their protests led them down the American Road to Revolution and were responsible for some of the Causes of the American Revolutionary War.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Name at least 2 regions
    8·2 answers
  • Mika can eat 212121 hot dogs in 666 minutes. She wants to know how many minutes (m)(m)(, m, )it would take her to eat 353535 hot
    5·1 answer
  • Should mars one "blast off" or not?
    5·1 answer
  • if a density of a substance is 7.8g/cm3, will the substance float or sink in water. science question.​
    5·1 answer
  • What is the difference between marginal cost and marginal revenue?
    11·2 answers
  • Pacific Islanders have suffered death and illness as a result of nuclear testing conducted in their region by
    6·2 answers
  • ^_^<br><br>-_-<br><br>:')<br><br>^-^<br><br>°-°<br><br>0o0<br><br>T o T<br><br>​
    14·2 answers
  • Please help asap!I will mark brainliest!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Why do you think the executive branch is formed the way it is.
    9·1 answer
  • Although the supreme court was the weakest of the three branches of government in the early day of the new republic, john marsha
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!