Answer:
It's rise/run.
May or not be right but I hope it helps!
I added the attachment.
Answer:
Yes, there is enough evidence to say the proportions are the same.
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis: The proportions are the same.
Alternate hypothesis: The proportions are not the same.
Data given:
p1 = 51% = 0.51
n1 = 200
p2 = 48% = 0.48
n2 = 150
pooled proportion (p) = (n1p1 + n2p2) ÷ (n1 + n2) = (200×0.51 + 150×0.48) ÷ (200 + 150) = 174 ÷ 350 = 0.497
Test statistic (z) = (p1 - p2) ÷ sqrt[p(1-p)(1/n1 + 1/n2) = (0.51 - 0.48) ÷ sqrt[0.497(1-0.497)(1/200 + 1/150)] = 0.03 ÷ 0.054 = 0.556
The test is a two-tailed test. At 0.10 significance level the critical values -1.645 and 1.645
Conclusion:
Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the test statistic 0.556 falls within the region bounded by the critical values.
The value of r so the line that passes through (-5,2) and (3,r) has a slope of -1/2 is -2
<u>Solution:</u>
Given that line is passing through point (-5, 2) and (3, r)
Slope of the line is 
Need to determine value of r.
Slope of a line passing through point
is given by following formula:
--- eqn 1

On substituting the given value in (1) we get

Hence the value of "r" is -2
<em>the</em><em> </em><em>pro</em><em>duct</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>2</em><em>6</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>x</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>wri</em><em>tten</em><em> </em><em>as</em>
<em>2</em><em>6</em><em> </em><em>times</em><em> </em><em>x</em><em> </em><em>=</em><em> </em><em>2</em><em>6</em><em>x</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>
</em>