Answer:
23. $ 62.76 to the nearest cent
$63.00 to the nearest dollar
24. $ 38.42 to the nearest cent
$38.00 to the nearest dollar
Step-by-step explanation:
When we round to the nearest cent we round the second number after the decimal. We look at the third number after the decimal. If it is 5 or above we round up.
When we round to the nearest dollar, we round the number befroe the decimal. We look at the number after the decimal. If it is 5 or above we round up.
23. $62.756 we round the 5 so we look at the 6 6>= 5 so we round up
$ 62.76 to the nearest cent
$62.756 we round the 2 so we look at the 7 7>= 5 so we round up
$63.00 to the nearest dollar
24. $38.415 we round the 1 so we look at the 5 5>= 5 so we round up
$ 38.42 to the nearest cent
$38.415 we round the 8 so we look at the 4 4< 5 so we leave alone
$38.00 to the nearest dollar
The ∆ABC has been transformed to yield ∆A'B'C'. The fourth diagram shows that the transformation could NOT be achieved by rotation alone.
The diagram is attached with the answer below:-
<h3 /><h3>What is dilation?</h3>
Dilation is the process of increasing the size of an object while maintaining its shape. Depending on the scale factor, the object's size can be increased or decreased.
In the first figure, ∆ABC has been transformed to yield ∆A'B'C' by rotation of 180 degrees either clockwise or counterclockwise along the midpoint of AB.
The second and third figures are the same. In both figures, ∆ABC has been transformed to yield ∆A'B'C' by rotation of 180 degrees either clockwise or counterclockwise along with the origin.
In the fourth figure, ∆ABC has been transformed to yield ∆A'B'C' by rotation of 180 degrees either clockwise or counterclockwise along with the origin.
But only in the fourth figure, ∆ABC has been transformed to yield ∆A'B'C' by reflection along the x-axis.
Therefore, the correct option is the 4th diagram.
To know more about dilation follow
brainly.com/question/3457976
#SPJ1
Answer:
You did not list any choices but that factors into:
(x +2) * ( x -3) * (x -3) = 0
Making the "zeroes" -2, 3 and 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
We can test this claim using the one proportion z test :
x = 25 ; n = 100
Phat = x / n = 25 / 100 = 0.25
H0 : P = 0.15
H0 : P > 0.15
The test statistic :
Z = (phat - p) ÷ √p(1-p)/n
Z = (0.25-0.15) ÷ √(0.15*0.85)/100
Z = 2.8
Using the Pvalue from Zscore calculator :
α = 0.05
Pvalue (Z < 2.8) =0.0026
Pvalue < α ; We reject the Null
<u>Solution-</u>
From the figure,
AE = 2.4
EB = 2.8
BC = 11.7
Area of rectangle 1 = 8.68 sq.in

(∵ sides of the rectangle 2)
Area of Triangle 1 = 6.48 sq.in


(∵ sides of the rectangle 1)


(∵ sides of the rectangle 2)



The area of Rectangle 2,

The area of Triangle 2,

The area of the whole figure = Area of Triangle 1 + Area of rectangle 1 + Area of Triangle 2 + Area of rectangle 2
= 6.48+8.68+8.82+6.44=30.42 sq.in