<u>Answer: </u>Wrongful interference with a contractual relationship requires the existence of enforceable contract, third party knowledge, and intentional inducement.
<u>Explanation:</u>
All the business consist of information which is invaluable and wants the employees to keep it within the business and not sell it to competitors. As they are the successful objectives of the business.
Contractual relationship is the relationship bound by legal requirements where there are two or more parties who agree with same terms through enforceable contract. Intentional inducement is where an individual causes damage to contractual relationship with third party. The damage can be of monetary basis.
Answer:
The answer is: D) All of the above are correct.
Explanation:
A) The state beach will tend to be overused because it is a public good that cannot exclude anyone from using it.
B) The state beach is a direct competition to other public or private beaches when it is used by the general public, since only one can be used at a given point in time.
C) The state beach is a common resource because it provides users with tangible benefits.
To combat this stereotyping the HR director has decided to<u> "adopt more transparent practices".</u>
Nowadays, pay transparency is an interesting issue among HR and compensation experts. Pay transparency doesn't need to be a win or bust approach where everybody knows every other person's compensation. Or maybe, we trust transparency is a range. It's how much an association will examine its general pay rehearses. Pay transparency is significantly something other than the dollar sum a business pays every worker. It's additionally being more open about how pay was resolved and giving a clarification of the organization's compensation grades.
Answer:
C) abandon the production of jam to fully specialize in the production of peanut butter and then trade with Company Q for jam.
Explanation:
According to different theories about trade specialization, a company or even a country should specialize in producing only those products that they can make better than their competition, i.e. have a comparative or absolute advantage in their production.
In this case, since Company R has a comparative advantage in the production of peanut butter, it should specialize in producing only that. In case they need jam, they should trade with Company Q in order to get some jam. Eventually Company Q will only produce jam since they have a comparative advantage in jam production.
Answer:
0.09 or 9%
Explanation:
This question has some irregularities. The correct question should be :
Elinore is asked to invest $4,900 in a friend's business with the promise that the friend will repay $5,390 in one year's time. Elinore finds her best alternative to this investment, with similar risk, is one that will pay her $ 5,341 in one year's time. U.S. securities of similar term offer a rate of return of 7%. What is the opportunity cost of capital in this case?
Solution
Given from the question
Investment (I) = $4,900
Return on investment (ROI) in one year = $5,341
Rate or opportunity cost of capital r is given by
ROI = I × (1 + r)
input the given data
$5,341 = $4,900 (1 + r)
$5,341 = $4,900 + $4,900r
$5,341 - $4,900 = $4,900r
r = ($5,341 - $4,900) / $4,900
r = 0.09
Or 9% in percentage
