The answer is the last one , sorry if I’m wrong
If an archaeologist discovers new evidence suggesting that humans inhabited an area before it was believed to have been inhabited, the archaeologist must first critically evaluate the work of other archaeologists who argue otherwise.
In this way, the archaeologist would be able to find points of agreement and disagreement in research already carried out to proceed with his study and then carry out additional tests on the evidence found.
<h3 /><h3>Importance of the scientific method</h3>
The scientific method is a set of rules that must be followed to produce proven scientific knowledge. Therefore, the method provides value and reliability to the research, protecting the researcher's subjectivity.
Therefore, when discovering new evidence about a topic, a researcher must critically evaluate the scientific material already produced to carry out new tests to prove its evidence.
The correct answer is:
- First critically evaluate the work of other archaeologists who argue otherwise.
Find out more information about scientific method here:
brainly.com/question/17216882
<span>Russia was forced to pay reparations to Germany
Russia lost territory under the terms of the treaty
They felt it did not punish Germany harshly enough.
Part of Russia's border became a demillitaried zone. Hope it helps. </span>
