Answer:
Option B, OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT.
Explanation:
Scope of employment refers to where an employee was and what actions were being undertaken when the injury took place. If the employee was within the scope of employment, then the employer would likely be held responsible. But, if the employee was outside the scope of employment, then it is harder to prove the employer was negligent.
Within the scope employment means the injury took place; on or near work premises, during business trips, within a company's vehicle, while running an errand for the employer.
Outside the scope employment means the employee was not conducting any official business when the injury took place.
In the case of Francis, although he was on an official errand, he stopped in the middle of delivery route to have lunch with his friends which was not part of his official errand and he got injured while doing so.
Therefore, Francis would normally be considered to be acting: OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT.
The given case involves c. both a state and a federal discrimination claim.
<h3>What is a Discrimination Claim?</h3>
This refers to the allegations that are leveled by an employee against his employer about job discrimination based on factors such as immigration status, national origin, etc.
Hence, we can see that in a discrimination claim, if the laws are the same, then a judge can make a decision and apply it to both federal and state claims.
With this in mind, we can see that because Rapunzel who lives in Massachusetts files a discrimination claim against her employer, this is both a federal and state claim because it happened in Massachusetts and she had exhausted her administrative remedies.
This leads to the consideration of the courts to file her claim as this can be arrived at based on the question of A. whether the case can be tried in federal court and which courts have personal jurisdiction over Rapunzel.
Read more about discrimination claims here:
brainly.com/question/5987026
Answer:
the average cost per unit that should be used to determine the cost of the units sold on January 28 is $ 59.00
Explanation:
The Weighted Average Cost Method calculates the new cost of Inventory with each purchase of Inventory.
The Perpetual Inventory System records the cost of inventory sold with each sale made.
<u>Calculation of the new cost of Inventory with each purchase of Inventory :</u>
January 10:
Cost per Unit = Total Cost / Total Number of Units
Cost per Unit = (( 600 units × $55 per unit ) + ( 1000 units × $59 per unit )) / 1600 units
= $ 57.50
January 20:
Cost per Unit = Total Cost / Total Number of Units
Cost per Unit = (( 1600 units × $57.50 per unit ) + ( 800 units × $62 per unit )) / 2400 units
= $ 59.00
There were no further purchases from this point
Thus cost per units remains at $ 59.00
Therefore the average cost per unit that should be used to determine the cost of the units sold on January 28 is $ 59.00
Answer: $3865.8
Explanation:
The formula to find the simple interest is given by :-
, where P is the initial amount deposited , r is the rate of interest in decimal and t is the time period in years.
Given : P= $1700 ; r= 9.8%=0.098 ; t=13 years
Then , the simple interest earned in 13 years will be :-
Now, the combined amount = P+I =$1700+$2165.8= $3865.8
Hence, the credit union would owe Heather $3865.8 in 13 years.
WH Approach refers to the sets of moral rules that urges us to look at whom as an activity influences, the motivation behind the activity, and how we see it ethically.
The W in the WH framework for business morals stands for "who or the character of the stakeholders".
The H in the WH framework for business morals stands for "how or the avenues the firm will use to manage it to its ultimate choice".