A researcher has been studying coral reef species diversity for the past two decades. In the first decade, she observed zero hur
ricanes and the species diversity on the reef remained the same. However, in the last decade, the reef experienced a few minor hurricanes. The researcher recently discovered an increase in the species diversity in the coral reef. These results could support:
As per the given description,<em></em><em>the results obtained from the researcher's study could support 'the intermediate disturbance hypothesis.' This kind of hypothesis proposes a theory that says that the topmost diversity among the species is controlled by a degree of disturbance. </em>Such a hypothesis carries a recurring idea which suggests that environmental disturbances influence the diversity of species in nature. <em>Since the given description of the researcher's study exemplifies the impact of environmental fluctuations or disturbances on the diversity of species, so, these results could be categorized under '</em><u><em>the intermediate disturbance hypothesis</em></u><em>.'</em>
It is true that some theoretical positions hold that individuals who embrace rigid beliefs function at a higher cognitive level than those who embrace a non-judgmental position.
They believe holding such a rigid belief means a high sense of maturity and belonging which is a characteristic of people who have high cognitive levels which is why the statement is said to be true.
Answer:An accomplice differs from an accessory in that an accomplice is present at the actual crime, and could be prosecuted even if the main criminal (the principal) is not charged or convicted. An accessory is generally not present at the actual crime, and may be subject to lesser penalties than an accomplice or principal.
