C because everyone should have a chance to apply for a job
Explanation:
As noted, Republicans and Democrats have dominated electoral politics since the 1860s. This unrivaled record of the same two parties continuously controlling a nation’s electoral politics reflects structural aspects of the American political system as well as special features of the parties.
The standard arrangement for electing national and state legislators in the United States is the “single-member” district system, wherein the candidate who receives a plurality of the vote (that is, the greatest number of votes in the given voting district) wins the election. Although a few states require a majority of votes for election, most officeholders can be elected with a simple plurality.
Unlike proportional systems popular in many democracies, the single-member-district arrangement permits only one party to win in any given district. The single-member system thus creates incentives to form broadly based national parties with sufficient management skills, financial resources and popular appeal to win legislative district pluralities all over the country. Under this system, minor and third-party candidates are disadvantaged. Parties with minimal financial resources and popular backing tend not to win any representation at all. Thus, it is hard for new parties to achieve a viable degree of proportional representation, and achieve national clout, due to the “winner-take-all” structure of the U.S. electoral system.
Why two instead of, say, three well-financed national parties? In part because two parties are seen to offer the voters sufficient choice, in part because Americans historically have disliked political extremes, and in part because both parties are open to new ideas (see below).
Explanation:
By 600 C.E., the classical empires of China, India and Rome had all crashed. ... in central Asia coincided with the peak of Silk Road trade between 600 and 1450 C.E.. ... However, the rapid spread of Islam across north Africa and the ... C. During this period (600-1450 C.E.) interregional trade in luxury goods
The weather there is perfect for different activities to happen. the land also contributes to the cause of so many activities
Answer:
The sociometric/peer acceptance category of controversial relates to children who are noticed by peers and are liked by a quite a few children and disliked by quite a few others.
Explanation:
<u>A sociometric status is a measurement that shows how liked or disliked children are by their peers.</u> It can be divided into five categories: popular, rejected, neglected, average, or controversial. <u>The controversial category is the one that answers our question. It refers to children who are liked by quite a few children and disliked by quite a few others. Children who belong to this category have qualities that can be perceived as good or bad by others.</u> For instance, they tend to be prone to anger, and may seem a bit snobbish. On the other hand, they can also be sociable, cooperative, and good at sports.
