So basically, what this question is asking you for is the surface area of the entire cone.
To find it, we can use the formula:
SA = 3.14*r*l+3.14*r^2, where r is radius and l is lateral height
Now, all we have to do is plug all of the given values into the equation
Therefore, the equation we get is:
SA = 3.14*1.5*5 + 3.14*1.5^2
If we simplify, we find that the surface area is equal to 30.615
If we round this number to the nearest whole number, we get 31 square inches
Therefore the answer is 31
Hope this helped!! :D
Step-by-step explanation:
which is better for sex with my sister and teacher
1.) manforce or Durex or masti
2.) dotted or plain
3.) banana or strawberry or choclate or pineapple or orange
tell answer for each respectively
Answer:
f(x) and g(x) have the same x-intercepts (is <em>not true</em>)
Step-by-step explanation:
g(x) is a reflection across the y-axis and a horizontal compression of f(x). In general those transformations will move the x-intercepts. (The y-intercept and the number of x-intercepts will remain unchanged.)
_____
<em>Comment on the question/answer</em>
f(x) = x^3 is a 3rd degree polynomial. When transformed to g(x) = -8x^2, its only x-intercept (x=0) remains the same. The answer above will not apply in any instance where the only x-intercept is on the line of reflection. (The question is flawed in that it does not make any exception for such functions.)
Answer:
A, B, E, and F
Step-by-step explanation:
sinx and cosx are defined for all values of x. So, sin⁻¹x and cos⁻¹x are also defined for all values of x.
A and E are correct.
tanx is defined for all values of x.
However, tan(nπ) = 0 at when n is an integer. So, tan⁻¹(±nx) is undefined. However, tan⁻¹(-½x) is defined, because -½ is not an integer.
B and F are correct.
C and D are <em>wrong</em>. Both sec⁻¹x and csc⁻¹x are undefined when -1 < x < 1, and -½ is in this forbidden region.
<span>que debería haber escrito sólo el problema para nosotros tal vez podríamos haber ayudado a continuación .</span>