Answer:
Jackson can only deduct $0.
Explanation:
The treatment of this question falls under Section 1244 of the IRS and its treatment for Tax.
According to Section 1244 Stock, there are conditions before a stock loss can be deducted as an ordinary loss.
Two of the requirements are as follows:
- The shareholder must have purchased the stock and not received it as compensation.
- Only individual shareholders who purchase the stock directly from the company qualify for the special tax treatment.
In the case of Jackson, the stock was inherited from his parents and not purchased directly from Bean Corp disqualifying from the provision of the section.
Anita should consider regional funds as the ideal type of international investment to invest in Nigeria's natural resources.
<h3 /><h3>What are regional funds?</h3>
It corresponds to a specific type of investment in securities in a location, it is managed by managers on a mutual basis, with a wide range of operations that are beyond its location.
Therefore, regional funds represent a safer alternative for investing in other countries, as their management is geared towards this end, with greater security and control as they are mutual funds.
Find out more about regional funds on:
brainly.com/question/4521829
#SPJ1
Answer:
Deal, and the best option is to pay the same amount at the end of the academic year.
The reason for this is that if you have that amount in an interest bearing account, the money will earn interest, meaning that after paying the tuition at the end of the year, you will have the interest earned for yourself.
In other words, the present value of your money is the full value of your tuition, while the future value of your money is the value of the tuition plus the interest earned.
Besides, because the time value of money decreases as time passes, the amount you pay in tuition will represent less of your total income at then end of the academic year, than at the beginning.
Answer:
Th answer is: I would reward the managers of restaurants 1 and 2
Explanation:
In my opinion Marcia should reward the two managers from restaurants 1 and 2 based upon the percentage of sales increase. She could give an X$ bonus to the manager of restaurant 1 as a prize for increasing sales by two percent. Then she could also give the manager of restaurant 2 the same X$ bonus but also give him (or her) a 3% raise.
I wouldn´t take any type of actions regarding the manager of restaurant 3. I would be let him know that I was rewarding the other managers because they performed better than him. I believe that rewards are usually more beneficial than punishments. I also believe people are selfish and greedy, so when manager 3 realizes he lost the opportunity of earning a bonus and a raise due to his poor performance, he will be motivated to work better next year.
