1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mixas84 [53]
3 years ago
10

Explain in a few sentences why a historian might not think that Engels’s description reflects a completely accurate picture of w

hat life was like in England during 1844.
History
2 answers:
Lubov Fominskaja [6]3 years ago
8 0
That is because Engels presented things much worse than they actually were so as to prove a point and spread his ideology. Of course that a little bias was necessary for that since it had to motivate people that they had it worse than they really had it.
Black_prince [1.1K]3 years ago
3 0
Engels focused exclusively on the problems experienced by the working class is England, and did not give equal attention to benefits or advantages brought about by industrialization.  

Historians might not be so quick to say that Engels "presented things worse than they actually were," as the other respondent here suggested.  Engels relied on his own direct observations and had testimony from other eye-witnesses as well.  He carefully chronicled  the harsh and harmful conditions seen in the industrial town of Manchester in 1842 to 1844 -- years during which Engels stayed in Manchester and did his writing.  His detailed depictions of the ugly side of industrialization tend to be accepted by historians as accurate and consistent with the conditions that working class persons there faced.

However, historians might question whether Engels was presenting a whole picture of life in England in the 1840s.  While the conditions of the working class were dire, those factory workers' lives were not easy before urbanization and industry, when they eked out a living on farms.  And there was an overall advancing of the economy and standards of living that the Industrial Revolution was producing -- though at first the advantages went far more to business owners rather than to workers. 

British historian (and Marxist) Victor Kiernan, writing a forward to the Penguin Classics edition of Engels' <em>Conditions of the Working Class in England, </em>noted that there were other things going on in Manchester besides the ugly side-effects of industry.  There was considerable intellectual activity to be found there, for instance. "But it was a darker side of life that Engels's eyes were fixed on," Kiernan said.   

So a historian might point out that Engels presented a one-sided picture rather than looking at all facets of what life was like in England in 1844.  But that was Engels' intention.  He wanted to highlight the conditions of the working class, because that was not what others were paying attention to as they hailed the advances being made by the acceleration of industrial production.  

You might be interested in
The 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month marked this moment,
valkas [14]
Its armistice day :)
6 0
2 years ago
A problem for the new nation after the war was that thousands of wealthy loyalists:
Savatey [412]

A major problem for the United States after the Revolutionary War (1775-1783) was that tens of thousands of Loyalists, due to the climate of violence and fear that still existed after the conflict (particularly in the South), fled the country, retreating with the British army to Britain and other parts of the British Empire (Jamaica, Bahamas, India) and also to Canada, settling primarily in the regions of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. Since those Loyalists were often wealthy and educated, and they had been part of the thriving and cohesive upper class that controlled much of the industry and the commerce in areas such as New York or Boston, the social structure of the colonies changed significantly after their departure.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did Donald Trump do before he became president?
son4ous [18]

He was a businessman and was known for being a tv personality.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the event impact each of the United States and the Soviet Union ? Explain.
andrezito [222]

Answer:

An arms race occurs when two or more countries increase the size and quality of military resources to gain military and political superiority over one another. The Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union is perhaps the largest and most expensive arms race in history; however, others have occurred, often with dire consequences.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Unlike a direct democracy, in which all citizens decide laws, a representative democracy involves which of the following?
leonid [27]
A representative democracy would involve Representatives, who were elected by citizens, deciding laws
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which TWO actions of President Grant suggest that he was corrupt?
    8·2 answers
  • What triggered the oil crisis of the 1970s?
    12·2 answers
  • Who was the hero at Saratoga that proclaimed the continental congress ?
    15·1 answer
  • "Just as Apostle paul left his village of Tarsus and carried the gospel of Jesus christ of the Greco Roman world, so am I compel
    7·2 answers
  • Which event represents an expression of nativism during the 1920s?
    14·1 answer
  • American literature began to emerge around the nineteenth century. Authors wrote what their culture was like through folk tales,
    5·1 answer
  • How did mongkut’s form of Buddhism help Siam adopt western ideas?
    5·1 answer
  • Cause and effects of the Great Depression
    6·1 answer
  • According to federal law, which of the following pieces of legislation addressing illegal immigration would state governments be
    14·2 answers
  • Select the correct text in the passage.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!