1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mixas84 [53]
3 years ago
10

Explain in a few sentences why a historian might not think that Engels’s description reflects a completely accurate picture of w

hat life was like in England during 1844.
History
2 answers:
Lubov Fominskaja [6]3 years ago
8 0
That is because Engels presented things much worse than they actually were so as to prove a point and spread his ideology. Of course that a little bias was necessary for that since it had to motivate people that they had it worse than they really had it.
Black_prince [1.1K]3 years ago
3 0
Engels focused exclusively on the problems experienced by the working class is England, and did not give equal attention to benefits or advantages brought about by industrialization.  

Historians might not be so quick to say that Engels "presented things worse than they actually were," as the other respondent here suggested.  Engels relied on his own direct observations and had testimony from other eye-witnesses as well.  He carefully chronicled  the harsh and harmful conditions seen in the industrial town of Manchester in 1842 to 1844 -- years during which Engels stayed in Manchester and did his writing.  His detailed depictions of the ugly side of industrialization tend to be accepted by historians as accurate and consistent with the conditions that working class persons there faced.

However, historians might question whether Engels was presenting a whole picture of life in England in the 1840s.  While the conditions of the working class were dire, those factory workers' lives were not easy before urbanization and industry, when they eked out a living on farms.  And there was an overall advancing of the economy and standards of living that the Industrial Revolution was producing -- though at first the advantages went far more to business owners rather than to workers. 

British historian (and Marxist) Victor Kiernan, writing a forward to the Penguin Classics edition of Engels' <em>Conditions of the Working Class in England, </em>noted that there were other things going on in Manchester besides the ugly side-effects of industry.  There was considerable intellectual activity to be found there, for instance. "But it was a darker side of life that Engels's eyes were fixed on," Kiernan said.   

So a historian might point out that Engels presented a one-sided picture rather than looking at all facets of what life was like in England in 1844.  But that was Engels' intention.  He wanted to highlight the conditions of the working class, because that was not what others were paying attention to as they hailed the advances being made by the acceleration of industrial production.  

You might be interested in
Which statement explains why Congress authorized arms sales to any nation that could pay in cash and arrange transportation?
Zarrin [17]
What are the statements?
5 0
3 years ago
Which part of the Legislative branch must approve all presidential nominees?
Levart [38]

Answer:

The Senate

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What requirements did settlers have to meet to keep their claims? check all of the boxes that apply. settlers had to promise to
Vladimir [108]
According the the Homestead Act of 1862, the only two valid answers are A. Settlers had to promise to avoid contact with American Indian tribal lands and D. Settlers had to improve the land (e.g., by buying a house) to keep it.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was a reason for southern secession? A. choosing Jefferson Davis as leader of the Confederate States B. f
I am Lyosha [343]

The correct answer is: C) familiarity with and disdain for the northern industrial workplace.

Secession and, therefore, Civil War were mainly about the right to own slaves. Slaves were, for the Southerns, the most important "material" in the workplace; their region relied on slave-owning in order to do agrarian work.

The Northerns, however, now were in their way to industrialization, where the work at factories was done by employed immigrants and, thus, they were all for abolishing slavery.

5 0
3 years ago
Which law most directly led to the General Motors sit-down strike in 1936? (4 points) Wagner Act Glass-Steagall Act Fair Labor S
Citrus2011 [14]

Answer:

fair labor standards act

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the Spanish soldiers who conquered the Americas called?
    12·2 answers
  • Give two reasons why hurricanes are more likely to strike new jersey than oregon.
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the Mongols have so much success in their military conquering campaign?
    10·1 answer
  • Help me solve this problem please
    7·2 answers
  • How many years did slavery last in the united states
    5·1 answer
  • When there is a clash between the Congress and the Constitution, who decides the outcome?
    8·2 answers
  • An action taken by employers by the government
    15·1 answer
  • How did the Inca successfully farm in such harsh, mountainous terrain? *
    12·1 answer
  • How were banks in the 1920s most notably different from banking systems today
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement best completes the diagram?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!