1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mixas84 [53]
3 years ago
10

Explain in a few sentences why a historian might not think that Engels’s description reflects a completely accurate picture of w

hat life was like in England during 1844.
History
2 answers:
Lubov Fominskaja [6]3 years ago
8 0
That is because Engels presented things much worse than they actually were so as to prove a point and spread his ideology. Of course that a little bias was necessary for that since it had to motivate people that they had it worse than they really had it.
Black_prince [1.1K]3 years ago
3 0
Engels focused exclusively on the problems experienced by the working class is England, and did not give equal attention to benefits or advantages brought about by industrialization.  

Historians might not be so quick to say that Engels "presented things worse than they actually were," as the other respondent here suggested.  Engels relied on his own direct observations and had testimony from other eye-witnesses as well.  He carefully chronicled  the harsh and harmful conditions seen in the industrial town of Manchester in 1842 to 1844 -- years during which Engels stayed in Manchester and did his writing.  His detailed depictions of the ugly side of industrialization tend to be accepted by historians as accurate and consistent with the conditions that working class persons there faced.

However, historians might question whether Engels was presenting a whole picture of life in England in the 1840s.  While the conditions of the working class were dire, those factory workers' lives were not easy before urbanization and industry, when they eked out a living on farms.  And there was an overall advancing of the economy and standards of living that the Industrial Revolution was producing -- though at first the advantages went far more to business owners rather than to workers. 

British historian (and Marxist) Victor Kiernan, writing a forward to the Penguin Classics edition of Engels' <em>Conditions of the Working Class in England, </em>noted that there were other things going on in Manchester besides the ugly side-effects of industry.  There was considerable intellectual activity to be found there, for instance. "But it was a darker side of life that Engels's eyes were fixed on," Kiernan said.   

So a historian might point out that Engels presented a one-sided picture rather than looking at all facets of what life was like in England in 1844.  But that was Engels' intention.  He wanted to highlight the conditions of the working class, because that was not what others were paying attention to as they hailed the advances being made by the acceleration of industrial production.  

You might be interested in
How was the process of industrialization similar in China and Russia?
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

the answer is letter D because both were run by communist governments

6 0
3 years ago
Why did Europeans generally buy slaves from slave traders rather than capturing the slaves themselves? A Slaves were so cheap th
statuscvo [17]

The answer is D. Africans were generally able to hide from or defend themselves against Europeans.

5 0
3 years ago
Identify three ways the Great Depression affected Latin America.
Softa [21]
The Great Depression which followed the US stock market crash of 1929 badly affected the countries of Latin America.[1] Before the global Great Depression of the 1930s, links between the United States economy and Latin American economies had been established through US investment in Latin America and Latin American exports to the US. As a result, Latin Americans felt heavy reverberations when the US market crashed in 1929.
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Place these World Series events in the order in which they occurred, starting with the earliest. Ty Cobb loses his duel with Hon
djverab [1.8K]
The answer to your question is John McGraw against the team
7 0
3 years ago
Why was the capture of vicksburg, mississippi, by union troops significant? it meant that union troops controlled the mississipp
aleksklad [387]

The Mississippi River is the only big waterway on the Confederate side. Control of this river by the Union meant fast travel of troops and supplies and ease of bombardment of many important cities by the river. Vicksburg was a fortress city that controlled the last Confederate controlled section of the river. Grant’s campaign and success against Vicksburg cut off Arkansas and Texas from Richmond, gave the Union a waterway for commerce, and replenishment of troops and supplies.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The 1995 bombing of the Murrah Federal building in Oklahoma brought awareness to Americans of
    11·1 answer
  • 1. Tim attends a city council meeting and voices his concern about a dangerous street intersection.
    9·1 answer
  • Please respond to the question in complete sentences. Give details or examples to support your answer.
    10·2 answers
  • Christopher Columbus introduced the Caribbean region to Europeans as a great place for economic ventures. What else did he intro
    15·1 answer
  • What is South Sudan?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following must be addressed to improve agriculture in the Middle East?
    13·2 answers
  • Regarding the federal court system, which of the following statements is false?
    12·1 answer
  • Nationalism led to major conflicts following World War I, especially when:
    9·1 answer
  • How was God invented? And how do you thing he made everything?
    9·2 answers
  • What are the social, political, and economic causes and consequences of the Second Industrial Revolution
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!